you honestly think that your website, which resembles the sparkly candy-vomit of a teenage girl, is an example of reputable journalism? that's like saying the creators of the glittery gif's on myspace are avant garde artists.

by your admission you have a lot of expendable income so that you can erase the degrees of separation between you, a small (also by your own admission) arrogant man, and some hot bitches. congratulations.

i wouldn't hesitate to say that the reason monstar's site is appealing is because of the friendly rapport between author and subject, something that you can't purchase, and something that definitely doesn't come about when you brag about the size of your wallet and how many hits you get. also, i guarantee most of your traffic is due to that hot whore ass you use for your incessant advertising, and not the quality of the content. here's another protip: AIM smiley's and generic questions forced upon bored stars do not make a journalist.