Quote:

---

Quote:

---

My moniker is appropriate asswipe. Not that you have the ability to understand anything beyond the concept of your own belief.... let's just say that you are the jurisprudent equivelant of salami. Sounds prerry darn isolationist to me.

---

Isolationist...moi? Nah. I'm the evil White heterosexual male imperialist that keeps you liberals shaking in your pink panties at night. Non-Americans exist only to serve and to suffer. ("Coalition of the willing" nations excluded...you guys rock! )

Fun with words:

Jurisprudence:

1.) The philosophy or science of law.
2.) A division or department of law: medical jurisprudence.


According to you, I have the "The philosophy or science of law" equivalent of a salami??? Spend less time watching Fahrenheit 9/11 and more time begging a five year-old to teach you some vocabulary skills, lunatic.

Quote:

---

LOL I let your support of an objectionable response do the talking here....

Why should I attempt to answer your imperious claims when you are so deeply afraid to go anywhere near my sincere and objective claims?

---

You have no "objective claims". "Bush is a dictator", "war for oil"...please. These are the thoughts you have been taught to parrot by Michael Moore and Al Franken.

If you want to criticize Bush, here are some pointers to avoid sounding like some Berkeley reject:

1.) Bush refuses to secure America's southern border even after 9/11.
2.) Bush has massively expanded the federal government, despite claiming to be a conservative. He nationalized airport security and added presidential cabinet positions.
3.) Bush opposes stem cell research, despite the overwhelming enthusiasm for it in the scientific community.

Hint: If your criticism of Bush sounds like it could come from the mouth of Nancy Pelosi, consider biting your tongue.

Also: Thanks for not denying my "liberal men are not heterosexual" thesis. I'll take that as acknowledgement of a self-evident fact.

---