Quote:

U.S. media willing to accept racist anarchy and mayhem? Here's a link to some footage where even FOX, the standards bearer of the conservative status quo, is saying how terrible the whole thing is:




Everyone is admitting that the situation is terrible, but only the foreign papers have been willing to cover the fact that there is a strong racial angle to the story: Black refugees have been targeting white refugees for abuse and violence. That is what I'm talking about.

Quote:


I think the main problem with the American media is that there's just so much of it. And, it's become such a over-crowded industry, the media outlets are basically desperate to find stuff to broadcast and publish so you get a lot of stuff you have to wade through that isn't even real stories. There's real news out there, but you got to know where to look for it in the US, and not just be watching a newscast designed to garner ratings rather than to inform. If you've found it in Britain and Australia, fair enough.



I don't disagree with what you said. News is a business. They do what brings their ownership revenue, even if that means 24/7 coverage of some drunken bimbo in Aruba who partied with the wrong locals and died for it. Conversely, they are inclined to ignore stories which may alienate an audience or decrease ad revenue, such as ones suggesting that the world's racists aren't just white heterosexual males.

Jesse Jackson and his travelling race-riot can quickly change the profitability of a business, so the media won't consider the need for the public to know the true nature of NOLA thugs, since they are overwhelmingly members of a minority group - and criticizing them would be "racist". Thankfully, overseas outlets aren't hamstrung in this manner.