Helpme doesn't have a clue. For starters, he should take a class in English as a Second Language.
Re: "The san fernando p[orn industry consists of about 900 to 1200 working performers every month. About 90% of these performers use no protection whatsoever. It's like a huge unprotected sex orgy that goes on every single day.To even speculate that one person is responsible for an "outbreak" of chlamydia is so ridiculous that it really doent even deserve comment. Not to mention that the original article by LUke ford states that HALF of the porn workers are out with STD's is BEYOND ridiculous."
During months like July, there are about 100 members of the talent pool working in the San Fernando Valley porn industry. For last week, perhaps there were about 60 different porn actors working. About 30 of those were women. I reported that about half of them were out because of STDS. That means about 15 women were out. For the one set I was on, five of their top choices for female talent were out with disease. Is it that hard to believe that another ten women in the Valley were out with disease?
"About 90% of these performers use no protection whatsoever."
Not at all clear. Studios such as Vivid are condom-only and some other talent are condom-only.
"It's like a huge unprotected sex orgy that goes on every single day."
That's nonsense. Many porners are highly selective who they work with and what they do. They check for test results. Many require condoms.
"If you have unprotected sex with multiple partners, who in turn are having unprotected sex with multitudes of other people you are going to get STD's and there is nothing anybody can do about it."
There are weeks where STDs are rife and there are weeks when they are rare. Your generalization is not accurate.
"As jommy d states.."when being offered bodily orfices...from someone who whatonly does so on a daily basis you might think twice before taking them up on that offer"" Wouldnt this accurately describe EVERY SINGLE PERSON who works in porn."
Nope. Almost everyone in porn has various things that they won't do or people they won't do.
"And to blame one person for an outbreak out of thousds upon thousands upon thousands of acts of unprotected sex really makes me question the education level of said person doing the reporting, and the people who believe it."
We've looked for patient zero in HIV outbreaks. It is not unreasonable to do the same here.
Helpme, with your shoddy thinking, spelling, and punctuation, you've obviously had only limited education. You might want to consult a dictionary before posting again.