Quote:

Jaimie, I guarenntee You I anm not Sharon Mitchell. Read some of my previous posts on this board and you will see that I am not her. But as usual on these boards, when someone offers up facts and/or insightful educated opinions, people begin to question the source and as usual ignore the substane of the post if favor of gossip and inuendo. I guess the actual facts about something as serious and contagioous std's is not as much fun or as entertaining as lies, gossip, innuendo, and outright bullshit.

That being said Jamie, what do you think of the actual information in my post? Would you mostly agree, or disagree or wou7ld you rather just try to fan the flames of gossip by attempting to pass me off as someone who I am not?

Specifically, what do you think about an industry "reporter'(luke), and i use the term "reporter" very loosley, who, when all of the facts are availabel to him, decides that he would rather print completely false information, hiding behing the cover story of "somebody sent this to me in an e-mail?

I dont know how to prove to you I'm not sharom mitchell, but if you're ever in san diego come to 3028 w. 5th street and ask for "helme" Everybody here knows who I am. I'd be more than glad to speak with you.

And Jamie, I do not mean to imply here that you attacked me in any way, but I would be interested in your opinion about what I put in my post, whether you believe i am sharom mitchell or not.




I was kidding. Sharon, as far as I know, doesn't generally keep that in touch with her fans ever since that crazy fuck nearly killed her outside of that club a few years ago. Relax, easy breathing. Yes, helpme you are very intelligent and yes, you got all your factual ducks lined up in a row. Nice and neat. But you are not Sharon Mitchell. I got it.

In your reply you were generally saying that everybody fucks everybody in porn sometimes outside of the regular piss pool, and more often than not, without a condom. Then you generally said that guys like Luke run presumptious stories (from fake e-mails from fake guys with fake handles -- wink wink helpme) placing the blame where it sometimes isn't warranted.

Uhm, that's not news!!!!!

A lot of people in porn are doing escort work on the side, and many others are fucking their fans, shooting up, using any and every drug out there, having one night stands, shooting 65 man creampie videos etc. -- this isn't news. As for the stats on that, I don't have them, but hey, I don't mind venturing a guess that it's over 50 percent of the performers working.

As for Luke not being a real journalist, I think he was once a very good journalist. His claim to fame, blowing the lid off the MW AIDS scandal in 97, definitely had its 'journalistic' merits. Now, I think he's grown bored with porn because nothing big has happened in awhile (minus the Darren James nightmare) and has generally impacted his writing. He doesn't care, and more often than not, neither does anybody else. This is porn! Hot nasty degrading sick meatholes gag factor slap happy porn. The same porn where girls are forced to vomit up their breakfast, get choked out, or take two and three dicks at one shot, all for our, the viewing audience's, pleasure.

Was the article Luke probably cut and pasted done in a sensationist fashion? Of course, that's what Luke does! He makes big things out of little things. And, honestly, that's what I want him to do. If I want straight ahead facts I'll head over to AVN where they can spoonfeed me the watered down nicey nicey stuff.
_________________________