Obviously you haven't read the other discussions and the stats from CDC. Yes male-male bareback is no more riskier than female to male but the tranmission rate is far higher. There are over 17691 new cases of male to male bareback HIV transmission compared to 298 for female to male bareback HIV transmission.

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/2004report/table3.htm

As far as healthy individuals, how does one know if they didn't catch anything from the time of their test to the time of the shoot?

The CDC and health care professions consider homosexual anal sex far more riskier than hetrosexual anal sex.

Okay 3 post guy. You obviously don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

Quote:

---

My porno review,

Stop being such a retard. Male-male bareback sex is no more risky than male-female bareback sex. In both cases, a penis goes into the colon. Big fucking deal.

If both partners taking part in the anal sex act are healthy, whether male-male or male-female, there is no risk to any of them. The risk is zero - repeat, zero.

The key to it is the health of the individuals. Two healthy individuals will never pass on anything to each other. If a healthy bisexual man has sex with a healthy woman, there is no risk at all.

Get your fucking facts right before commenting on this issue again, retard.

---

web page