Maybe not the most original thing ever conceived. But I like this idea.

You know those HD camcorder glasses they sell? Yeah I'm sure the visuals wouldn't be amazing... but something about being able to relive her torment vicariously through her own POV intrigues the hell outta me. I'm sure some of you know what I mean.

Would love to see this but know better than to think it would be done. Probably have better luck begging some amateur couple to try this.

i'm gonna be the killjoy here and say bad idea jeans.

you're gonna have blur, depth of field issues, and she'll be re-arranging her glasses the entire time (since the cam will pick up different angles from the am lens- not the girl's iris looking around.)

and you know since it's from her pov, you as the male viewer would be getting nothing but views of the dude, right? nothing wrong with it if that's your proclivity, but just checking.

No kidding, the camera would show nothing but hairy man belly.

It may work if someone shot it from over her shoulder, but again, hairy man belly. I guess it depends on the intended audience. (No offense to the OP).

Eh. Your points are valid bout the visual aspect. But still miss the appeal which no isn't about man belly. I realize youll mostly be getting that in the shot but didn't much expect that being on the receiving end of a face fuck is all that scenic.

I've seen these glasses in other applications and it seems to work very well for a good POV perspective.

Sure it would mostly be a back and forth jerking towards a wall of skin. But would also be accompanied by some spectacular audio given the glasses being firmly secured to her skull.

Being on the receiving end of a face fuck is indeed scenic. But my eyes have the ability to take in his face, cock, hands, the way his mouth tenses up, the way the light coming in from the window hits the blond hairs on his arms...if there was a cam to capture that, game on. But the cam glasses wouldn't be so visceral.

^^^ Yeah, Project Brainstorm technology doesn't exist yet. Remember that scene where the dude put the porn on endless loop and almost died from it?

Also, this whole idea is super gay.

More like the coolest thing you ever heard

^^^Says the guy who's interested in shifting his viewing perspective to that of someone being face-fucked. That makes you one thing: a meat gazing faggot.

If you want to see what someone who is sucking a cock sees I think you could probably get your wish.

@Steezo: he doesn't even want to meat gaze, he wants to belly gaze.

I don't see the visual appeal in this idea as part of the porn experience for me is viewing the girl and not what she sees. I don't care what she sees. I would be totally cool with her being blind.

The idea behind Point Of View porn is to make the viewer have a first hand experience (first person point of view and all). If I am following your idea you are looking for "porn" that is all mope all the time. Considering anatomy women don't have a very good view of the action during sex. If you were to have glasses cameras on porn girls you would get a bunch of close ups of those porn tongue sword fighting "kisses" and long views of furniture and pubic hair.

This was distinctly not the coolest thing I have ever heard. Nice try though.

Was the coolest thing steezo heard I'm sure.

Say for example. You've seen a ton of vids of some guy who does some major down hill wrecking on a bike. If you were as obsessed with crash vids as I am face fucking vids. You'd be intrigued by a pov of the crash from the riders perspective. Might not look as cool but you'd enjoy seeing the carnage from the position of the victim.

You probably have to be more a fan of face fucking than you are a fan of pretty looking girls to really get it.

Between the concept and the sig, someone's trying way too hard to sound like an adt poster.

"Something about being able to relive her torment vicariously through her own POV"

Whether it was intentional or not, this sounds ultra-gay.

Well, you can be sure any whore participating in this brain dead idea for a series is going to want to watch her scene so she can "relive" it. Right? That makes sense right?

Whatever that means. Okay.



Way hung up on insecurity. I bet you're the type that thinks DP is gEEY as hell. Maybe you only watch GG.

Who said they would? Do whores even watch their own scenes? Hell, I don't know, don't care either. The scene isn't for her anyway. Never said anything about the whole damn bowling alley, just maybe one scene. It's called experimenting. Do something fucking different for once.

You said it, idiot.



Let's see.. 3 people having sex together and 2 of them are male. It's not straight, by the very definition this act is NOT heterosexual. Bisexual maybe?

Don't assume shit because you don't understand the context of what I write on here. I'm talking about the viewer. HOW CAN SHE LIVE VICARIOUSLY THROUGH HER OWN PERSPECTIVE? Think about it first.

I'm not sure what the gay factor of DP is, but I do know that I just can't stand seeing two hairy mope asses/ballsackz with a whore buried in between somewhere.

I think I can clear that up for ya fartz. Any threesome featuring both genders is by definition bisexual no matter how the participants identify. If you are male and having sex with another man and a woman then you are bi.

You CANNOT have a heterosexual threesome, let alone a DP.



I did think about it. Thus me calling you an idiot.

Tell me something though, why do you closeted folks need to dance around the fact that you want to suck a dick and just come out and say it? You realize what this whole thread sounds like right?

Why not go blow a guy and tell us about it and we'll tell you if that is something we would want to see from your point of view? Cool?

It couldn't have been plainer. Thanks for playing.

Don't waste your time arguing with this one boys. It's a work, and not even one that "does werk."

But you can't read and understand a sentence... how am I the idiot?

You can sit there are squabble about what's gay and what's not all day long. I don't give shit. Not only do I not give a shit, I don't give a hell.

I bounce ideas that I find intriguing. If you don't like it, fuck off. My feelings aren't gonna get hurt on here, so go on deride all you want.

And you can't "wright" (quoting you).

Your utter lack in understanding the term vicarious is a bit more pathetic than my confusion of the spelling of write with wright. It's a common mistake, you're just a dumb dumb.

And you can't "wright" (quoting you).

Conq, I like that second one. That's an awesome tree to nap under.

It's like it's own hammock the way some of the lower branches are shaped.

This one is lovely.

The guy wants to see wood coming at him at eye level, not trees.

That's not a tree's POV 'tards. It would be ideally a pic facing out from the highest peak.

This might be a good idea for gay porn.