House Approves Deal

Posted by: Anonymous

House Approves Deal - 10/03/08 01:21 PM

House Approves $700B Financial Rescue Package

President Bush Signs Bill Into Law Same Afternoon



In a dramatic reversal, the House today approved by a comfortable margin a $700 billion financial rescue package that will bring the greatest intervention of the federal government into the private marketplace since the Great Depression, attempting to prevent the economy from sliding into a deep recession.

Just four days after the bill's initial demise sparked a free fall on Wall Street, the House approved the legislation 263-171. At 1:23 p.m., the measure cleared a majority of votes, and the chamber broke out in applause.

After initially rejecting the bill by a 2-to-1 margin, House Republicans mustered 91 votes in favor of it on the second try, with 172 Democrats supporting its passage. One hundred eight Republicans and 63 Democrats voted against the bill. The Senate approved the package Wednesday...

"By coming together on this legislation, we have acted boldly to prevent the crisis on Wall Street from becoming a crisis in communities across our country," Bush said in a statement at the White House. He said the bill's provisions "represent decisive action to ease the credit crunch that is now threatening our economy."

Bush acknowledged that some Americans "have concerns about this legislation, especially about the government's role and the bill's cost." He added: "As a strong supporter of free enterprise, I believe government intervention should occur only when necessary. In this situation, action is clearly necessary."

He predicted that "ultimately, the cost to taxpayers will be far less than the initial outlay," because many assets the government purchases are likely to rise in value "once the market recovers."

Bush cautioned that "it will take some time for this legislation to have its full impact on our economy" and pledged that the government will "take the time necessary to design an effective program" to implement the legislation.

Formally known as the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, it authorizes Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. to initiate what is likely to become the biggest government bailout in U.S. history, allowing him to spend up to $700 billion to relieve faltering banks and other firms of bad assets backed by home mortgages, which are falling into foreclosure at record rates.

The plan gives Paulson broad latitude to purchase any assets from any firms at any price and to assemble a team of individuals and institutions to manage them. In wielding those powers, Paulson and others hope to contain a crisis that has caused the failure or forced the rescue of a half-dozen major Wall Street firms and unnerved markets around the world.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which represents more than 3 million businesses and organizations, hailed the vote, which it said would begin restoring the flow of credit to the economy. "With the American economy on life support, Congress took the necessary step to stop the bleeding," said R. Bruce Josten, the chamber's executive vice president of government affairs. "Today's bipartisan vote in the House is a major step toward stabilizing the credit markets and supporting Main Street businesses..."

Paulson, who first told lawmakers of the need for the legislation Sept. 18, initially sent a three-page bill to Capitol Hill seeking almost unfettered power in the rescue plan. But, in two weeks of negotiations that ensued, Democrats and Republicans modified the plan to include limits on executive compensation for firms that participate in the program, provide the government an equity position in these firms to ensure the government can recoup the $700 billion and, in a nod to Republicans, added an insurance program for those security-backed mortgages that are not in complete distress...

Over the past three days, groups as varied as AARP and the National Federation of Independent Business have organized campaigns showering hundreds of thousands of e-mails and phone calls on members of Congress to counter a wave of calls and e-mails that, before Monday's vote, was overwhelmingly opposed to a bailout. A tide of lobbyists representing corporate executives, small-business owners, farmers and retirees swamped Capitol Hill yesterday to push for the bailout, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce also began running full-page newspaper ads highlighting what it described as a massive threat to the economy if the package is not passed...


Washington Post



Text of the Bill, if anyone cares to read it.
Posted by: the unknown pervert

Re: House Approves Deal - 10/03/08 05:04 PM

So all they needed to do to pass this is add 200 pages of pork to the end of it. Paging Alex Panzer, Congress needs an enema.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: House Approves Deal - 10/03/08 06:25 PM

Thank Pelosi for a lot of that. This could have been done earlier this week.
Posted by: Gunker

Re: House Approves Deal - 10/03/08 09:30 PM

Oregon gots its children's arrow tax repeal!

Economy saved!

http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2008/10/an_oregon_arrow_maker_suffers.html

"As of Friday, Dishion received more than 100 phone calls, 40 e-mails and hate mail from people across the country, not to mention phone calls from the BBC and mentions on the Bill O'Reilly talk show."
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: House Approves Deal - 10/03/08 09:37 PM

Quote:

lawmakers, while trying to correct another problem with the arrow tax...





Just how the fuck many taxes are there on arrows that they have a multiplicity of "problems" with them?
Posted by: Gunker

Re: House Approves Deal - 10/03/08 10:08 PM

At least our guy (Blumenauer) still votednNo, arrow-pandering bedamned:

http://www.votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_member.php?cs_id=22467

Posted by: Anonymous

Re: House Approves Deal - 10/04/08 03:41 PM

So you're against the deal then?
Posted by: Gunker

Re: House Approves Deal - 10/04/08 04:28 PM

Yes. The pork-free version that was voted down earlier would've been better than this one.

Also should have included a stock transaction tax (0.25%, just like Britain), and of course, the earlier-mentioned Sanders' tax on those with very high incomes. Maybe some kind of incentive for QUALIFIED first-time home buyers to create a bottom-up flow of monies.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: House Approves Deal - 10/04/08 05:18 PM

Quote:

The pork-free version that was voted down earlier would've been better than this one.




I agree wholeheartedly. And there's blame on both sides to go around for that debacle.

OTOH, If this one hadn't been passed, can you imagine the Pork that would have been included in the next one?

Quote:

Maybe some kind of incentive for QUALIFIED first-time home buyers to create a bottom-up flow of monies.





I don't disagree with this, but I think that's a battle for another day, as part of a wholescale reform of the mortgage industry. Again, can you imagine the type of pork that would have had to have been included in the bill to get this passed?