Am I just out of the loop? I find nothing fucking hot about creampies at all.
Same here, but I still like Gia's "forced" creampie idea. I think it's more about seeing a porngirl go beyond what she wants to/agreed to than it is about creampies. Getting an authentic reaction from the real person behind the porn persona, or just plain sadistic.
It wouldn't be considered rape. I've thought this over. She's consenting to the sex; just not the internal.
What's the legal status for something like that? A lot of girls have stuff on their "don't" lists like facials, creampies, anal insertions that can accidentally happen on set. Will the producers get sued for it? Could it be considered a form of sexual assault if a performer "accidentally" splooges over a no facial porngirl's mug? Will they just get a bad rep and not be able to hire anyone after that?
If it was feasible legally and practically it seems like somehow tricking established pornstars into doing stuff they are known for not wanting to do would be a niche to exploit. Example: use reality porn scenario and blindfolds or gloryholes to get a lesbian only pornstar to touch dick, a racist pornstar to unknowingly play with a black one, accidental anal insertion or creampie during intercourse, accidental facial during a blowjob etc
When a long-time anal dodger willingly gives it up it gets put on the cover of an elegant angel DVD, the demand to see established performers doing acts they've noticeably avoided has to be there.
that the same thing conky?
