AVN Nominees

Posted by: Jerkules

AVN Nominees - 11/21/14 08:56 AM

There are only 2 awards I pay attention to, Best New Starlet and Performer of the Year. Who are your picks to win?

Best New Starlet

August Ames
Carmen Caliente
Misha Cross
Carter Cruise
Aidra Fox
Keisha Grey
Janice Griffith
Chanell Heart
Jillian Janson
Katerina Kay
Belle Knox
Ariana Marie
Scarlet Red
Samantha Rone
Dakota Skye


Female Performer of the Year

Anikka Albrite
A.J. Applegate
Adriana Chechik
Dani Daniels
Skin Diamond
Veruca James
Zoey Monroe
Maddy O'Reilly
Chanel Preston
Romi Rain
Riley Reid
Bonnie Rotten
Dahlia Sky
Jada Stevens
Jodi Taylor

I would vote Dakota Skye for New Starlet.

POTY? I feel the noms are kinda light. No whore really stands out to me. I would guess Bonnie Rotten repeats, but I would vote Skin Diamond or Adriana Chechik.
Posted by: Barry the Pirate

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/21/14 11:04 AM

Dakota Skye, too. She's a game whore.
Posted by: frankie fatale

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/21/14 12:30 PM

best new starlet id pick august ames,ariana marie,or keisha grey.

performer of the year goes to romi rain.i havent bought her darkside video yet but based on the trailer its a no brainer.
Posted by: Willie D

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/21/14 12:59 PM

I gotta gree on Dakota Sky. A pint-sized bundle of perversion. I'd go Aidra Fox 2nd, decent whore.

But why the crap is Rotten still hanging around? Is this vote-buying or something? That skank's holes are born out wider than the Lincoln Tunnel. Ditto with Skin. Grow your fucking hair out, you skrillex piece of dung. That fad has come and gone.
Posted by: NitneLiun

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/21/14 02:36 PM

I like Ariana Marie. She did a glory hole scene that would have given a corpse a hard-on.
Posted by: Smokezilla

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/21/14 06:13 PM

I'm split between my girls Dakota and Janice.

And Skin Diamond in a landslide, that bitch is sex
Posted by: artxmaverick

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/21/14 07:17 PM

Romi Rain, for me. Not sure what more you could want from a porn whore. Adriana Chechik as well, but I haven't come across many of her scenes. Only a few.



Posted by: Smokezilla

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/21/14 11:16 PM

I didn't even see Chechik there, fuck, of course she is. That girl is a savage. Never saw her on any porn set, other than a 7 minute video made in my bathroom a couple months back, but on her own time, she's a fucking party. I mean, the MDMA helped her and her girlfriend loosen up a bit, but even at the bar before we even took it she was wild, or as the kids say these days "she was turnt the fuck up!"

Skye/Griffith & Diamond/Chechik. That's a tag team hell in a cell match I want to be booked for, or better yet, I want to book! Hmmmm....
Posted by: Jack Randall

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/21/14 11:55 PM

Dakota and Dani.
Posted by: Steezo

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/21/14 11:55 PM

She looks like she's into healthy living and good, clean fun.

Posted by: Steezo

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/22/14 12:26 AM

From listening to Adriana Chechik being interviewed by Howard Stern, she's had gonorrhea 8 times and blames it on reinfecting herself by not cleaning her toys and mentioned that she did 2 blow bangs in a week for a total of 30 guys.
Posted by: Willie D

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/22/14 08:54 AM

I know exactly who's gonna win: which ever whore sucks off Mark Kernes the most in the next few months, and probably offers up her babyhole as well. Shit, even that dipshit Peter Warren might finally get laid.
Posted by: Barry the Pirate

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/22/14 05:14 PM

You mean the awards in the the porn industry might not be on the up and up? There really aren't any institutions to believe in anymore.
Posted by: Smokezilla

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/22/14 10:37 PM

Bullshit, next thing you'll tell me my boy Santa Ain't real
Posted by: HillbillyHarry

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/23/14 07:25 PM

Heard the easter bunny is not real also
Posted by: Willie D

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/23/14 08:52 PM

Originally Posted By: Barry the Pirate
You mean the awards in the the porn industry might not be on the up and up? There really aren't any institutions to believe in anymore.
heh heh, there are so many threads about that on this board. I was thinking back to Emily Evermore and AVN then-editor Mike Ramone, before his gay phone sex alias got outed. Check LiB, the archives are back up. laugh
Posted by: HillbillyHarry

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/23/14 09:40 PM

Dakota or Carter and Adriana or Maddy.
Posted by: Houstondon

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/24/14 05:35 PM

Originally Posted By: Willie D
I know exactly who's gonna win: which ever whore sucks off Mark Kernes the most in the next few months, and probably offers up her babyhole as well. Shit, even that dipshit Peter Warren might finally get laid.


Having seen Mark, Peter, and others at AVN in private lamenting how a particular nominee did not win (different nominees for each in different categories), even questioning the judgement of the rest of us voters, I tend to dismiss the conspiracy theories aside. I've also seen heavy advertisers lose key categories and act pissy for months afterward. But if it suits some to think that their personal flavor of the month/week/year or whatever losing is objective evidence of a fix being in, so be it. lol
Posted by: Houstondon

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/24/14 05:38 PM

Originally Posted By: Willie D
Originally Posted By: Barry the Pirate
You mean the awards in the the porn industry might not be on the up and up? There really aren't any institutions to believe in anymore.
heh heh, there are so many threads about that on this board. I was thinking back to Emily Evermore and AVN then-editor Mike Ramone, before his gay phone sex alias got outed. Check LiB, the archives are back up. laugh

Just because one person misled another regarding their chances at an award does not invalidate the entire process.
Posted by: Willie D

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/24/14 06:24 PM

Well, crap buckets, Don. You're no fun! laugh

Happy Thanksgiving all the same! laugh
Posted by: Houstondon

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/24/14 06:34 PM

Originally Posted By: Willie D
Well, crap buckets, Don. You're no fun! laugh

Happy Thanksgiving all the same! laugh


I know, I suck the fun out of everything some times. On a bright note, I made the day of one ADT'er the other day on twitter. Apparently, all men are guilty of rape, they just don't know it yet, one William Cosby the target of her rants. I commented in the outside of porn section for anyone that cares. wink

As I'll be subjected to turkey from all my married friends starting in a few days, I plan on taking a friendly female pal to a Chinese buffet on Thursday. I hope all of you have a good time.
Posted by: Generizer

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/27/14 08:21 PM

Here's a question for you then. How can you nominate ones website when you haven't even seen the guts and glory within? I was nominated last year and no one asked for a password. Of which I wouldn't have a problem doing so. That was clue enough to know that I had no chance at winning. But then again, I won't name names but there was one site that won and it hadn't been updated in 6 months. I know because I joined it smile
Posted by: Jerkules

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/27/14 09:48 PM

Did you have a PR person at the time?

If you want to win an award, Gen, I'd gladly put the word in for you to receive a G.A.P.E (Great Achievement in Pornographic Entertainment) award. Don't worry, you won't have to cheat on yer hubby to gain my favor, since buttsecks is sodomy, not sex, so it aint cheatin.

What do you want a Nom for? Lifetime Achievement? T.W.O.T.Y (Twitter Whore Of The Year)? Retired, But Still Holding Up?
Posted by: Steezo

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/27/14 09:59 PM

Originally Posted By: Jerkules
buttsecks is sodomy, not sex

Welcome to Catholicism.
Posted by: Jerkules

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/27/14 10:05 PM

Originally Posted By: Steezo
Originally Posted By: Jerkules
buttsecks is sodomy, not sex

Welcome to Catholicism.


Yep. Bonus is you don't need a rubber if you put it in the butt.
Posted by: frankie fatale

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/28/14 12:03 AM

Originally Posted By: Steezo
Originally Posted By: Jerkules
buttsecks is sodomy, not sex

Welcome to Catholicism.

by definition sodomy is any sexual activity that isnt vaginal.so if youve ever gotten jerked off even,then youre a sodomite.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/28/14 08:17 AM

Originally Posted By: Steezo
Originally Posted By: Jerkules
buttsecks is sodomy, not sex

Welcome to Catholicism.


I haven't spewed my morning beer laughing in, like, forever. Thank you.
Posted by: Houstondon

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/28/14 10:19 AM

Originally Posted By: Generizer
Here's a question for you then. How can you nominate ones website when you haven't even seen the guts and glory within? I was nominated last year and no one asked for a password. Of which I wouldn't have a problem doing so. That was clue enough to know that I had no chance at winning. But then again, I won't name names but there was one site that won and it hadn't been updated in 6 months. I know because I joined it smile


Both AVN and XBiz rely on outsiders to their organizations to suggest nominations. It is entirely possible that you have industry employed fans suggesting your website as wonderful and amazing, then folks at either organization making it happen based on subject matter experts who ARE members of your website. I don't vote in the web based stuff nor do I generally nominate things in areas outside my areas of expertise so that is perhaps the best answer I can provide you.

For all I know, they needed one more website and having received several pre-noms for it, they vetted the site by reading reviews. As far as the winning website, if it had been updated "within the last six months" then it surely fell into the time table of awards for either group for when it was updated, those who may have loved it earlier in the year picking it over a more frequently updated site. (If you joined after the nomination period, it would have had a full year to be seen by whomever votes).

In some categories, there are very few voters who therefore hold more sway. Most feel competent voting for best performer even if they have only seen a few performances per each nominee, in other categories, there might only be a few subject matter experts such as tranny, BBW, gay, or whatever.
Posted by: simpson

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/28/14 10:26 AM

dakota for the win.
Posted by: Generizer

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/28/14 07:42 PM

Originally Posted By: Jerkules
Did you have a PR person at the time?

If you want to win an award, Gen, I'd gladly put the word in for you to receive a G.A.P.E (Great Achievement in Pornographic Entertainment) award. Don't worry, you won't have to cheat on yer hubby to gain my favor, since buttsecks is sodomy, not sex, so it aint cheatin.

What do you want a Nom for? Lifetime Achievement? T.W.O.T.Y (Twitter Whore Of The Year)? Retired, But Still Holding Up?


What do I need a PR pimp for? All they do is spread news around the industry. It doesn't really get word out to the public where it really matters. I have much better things to spend $1000 a month on. I'm doing quite alright without that waste of time crap. LOL
Posted by: Willie D

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/28/14 07:49 PM

Originally Posted By: Generizer
What do I need a PR pimp for? All they do is spread news around the industry. ... I'm doing quite alright without that waste of time crap....
Somewhere in smut cyberspace, an Indian named Alex Raymond and a gay fanboy named Sal Mckvey are crying themselves to sleep over this comment. And I fukkin' love it.

P, we still pay props to uncle Ronnie all the time! laugh
Posted by: Smokezilla

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/28/14 09:18 PM

Having a PR guy seems as wasteful to me as having an agent in porn. If you're any kind of hustler, you don't need that shit. The ho's that are good at twitter can cover all bases themselves
Posted by: Houstondon

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/29/14 03:42 AM

Originally Posted By: Smokezilla
Having a PR guy seems as wasteful to me as having an agent in porn. If you're any kind of hustler, you don't need that shit. The ho's that are good at twitter can cover all bases themselves


That's just it, many performers do not want to be bothered doing their own tweets, FB messages, forum posts, etc. It's easier to hire someone so they can enjoy life while the slavering fanboys are left unaware. Not all of them cost $1000/month either, especially now with so much competition but even C3X is making money running some of their accounts, remember?

But over the years, I've been made privy to all sorts of comments regarding "oh that's just my publicist/friend/agent/etc posting for me", the ADT forums huge with that kind of thing before twitter and other social media took off. The stuff that goes to the industry is good for garnering attention of directors, producers, and such while the stuff going outside nets website memberships, "dates", and the like, to pay the bills. It's just part of the game.
Posted by: butterman

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/29/14 05:50 PM

New - Dakota or Carter

Best- Riley or Zoey

There are no losers in either category- all are hot and fuck with passion (or good acting like they do)!
Posted by: Generizer

Re: AVN Nominees - 11/29/14 09:50 PM

Originally Posted By: Smokezilla
Having a PR guy seems as wasteful to me as having an agent in porn. If you're any kind of hustler, you don't need that shit. The ho's that are good at twitter can cover all bases themselves


Big time. Girls these days have it so much easier not having an agent due to everyone using Twitter about every hour of everyday. I got about 95% of my work over the years all on my own and without this new level of social network pimpery.
Posted by: Houstondon

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/04/14 10:28 AM

Originally Posted By: butterman
New - Dakota or Carter

Best- Riley or Zoey

There are no losers in either category- all are hot and fuck with passion (or good acting like they do)!

Y'all have it easy, you can pick one or two and be done with it. I have to rank order each nominee from best to worse without the benefit of guidelines to work with. Does "Best" require anal, IR, circus act sex in general, or can it be liking what they do and having fun too? What about how productive someone was; is 100 scenes with 15 really strong ones and 30 sucky scenes better than 50 scenes with 10 strong scenes and 5 that sucked?
Posted by: butt reynolds

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/04/14 03:14 PM

Misha Cross for best new starlet. That girl is fine as fuck and filthier than a mexican toilet
Posted by: Jerkules

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/04/14 06:05 PM

Originally Posted By: Houstondon
Originally Posted By: butterman
New - Dakota or Carter

Best- Riley or Zoey

There are no losers in either category- all are hot and fuck with passion (or good acting like they do)!

Y'all have it easy, you can pick one or two and be done with it. I have to rank order each nominee from best to worse without the benefit of guidelines to work with. Does "Best" require anal, IR, circus act sex in general, or can it be liking what they do and having fun too? What about how productive someone was; is 100 scenes with 15 really strong ones and 30 sucky scenes better than 50 scenes with 10 strong scenes and 5 that sucked?


Can't be Starlet or Performer w/o taking it in the shit pipe. Has anyone won the Cy Young by only pitching to the All Star break? Anyone win Best Actor for voice work in a cartoon? If a whore don't give it her all, then she can't be the best new whore or best all around whore.

Volume? Eh, # of Noteworthy Performances is what should matter, not the percent.
Posted by: Colonel Klink

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/05/14 12:21 PM

Will the editors of Tattoo Magazine, Urban Ink Magazine, and Body Art Magazine be the only three judges selecting the winners again this year?
Posted by: Houstondon

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/05/14 02:34 PM

Originally Posted By: Colonel Klink
Will the editors of Tattoo Magazine, Urban Ink Magazine, and Body Art Magazine be the only three judges selecting the winners again this year?

No such luck, mainly the same voters from the last 5 or so years according to my list. I'm not even particularly ink friendly but there was definitely a great deal of support for a few heavily inked performers, most of it earned.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/05/14 08:50 PM

"Tats ruin women."

--- Some "Old Fashioned Romantic" who got kicked off of ADT
Posted by: Jerkules

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/05/14 10:11 PM

Originally Posted By: J.B.
"Tats ruin women."

--- Some "Old Fashioned Romantic" who got kicked off of ADT


Tough call. Chicken/Egg thing w/ Tattoos & Ruining.
Posted by: Smokezilla

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/06/14 05:30 PM

Originally Posted By: Jerkules
Originally Posted By: Houstondon
Originally Posted By: butterman
New - Dakota or Carter

Best- Riley or Zoey

There are no losers in either category- all are hot and fuck with passion (or good acting like they do)!

Y'all have it easy, you can pick one or two and be done with it. I have to rank order each nominee from best to worse without the benefit of guidelines to work with. Does "Best" require anal, IR, circus act sex in general, or can it be liking what they do and having fun too? What about how productive someone was; is 100 scenes with 15 really strong ones and 30 sucky scenes better than 50 scenes with 10 strong scenes and 5 that sucked?


Can't be Starlet or Performer w/o taking it in the shit pipe. Has anyone won the Cy Young by only pitching to the All Star break? Anyone win Best Actor for voice work in a cartoon? If a whore don't give it her all, then she can't be the best new whore or best all around whore.

Volume? Eh, # of Noteworthy Performances is what should matter, not the percent.


I respectfully disagree. I enjoy delivering a gape inducing shitpipe pounding as much as the next guy, but there are girls that were/are bad as fuck without ever having taken it in the knot. Jessie Andrews, Ash Hollywood, and while I know she finally took the plunge, Lexi was and still is amazing before she ever has her dumper pounded.
Posted by: Jerkules

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/06/14 09:38 PM

Ash Hollywood don't get the pooper pounded? That's a damn shame.
Posted by: Smokezilla

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/06/14 11:50 PM

If I recall correctly, its not her thing, or it wasnt at the time.

Or FLOP
Posted by: Jigaloo

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/07/14 05:51 AM

Originally Posted By: Smokezilla
I respectfully disagree. I enjoy delivering a gape inducing shitpipe pounding as much as the next guy, but there are girls that were/are bad as fuck without ever having taken it in the knot. Jessie Andrews, Ash Hollywood, and while I know she finally took the plunge, Lexi was and still is amazing before she ever has her dumper pounded.


Jessie finally did it in an odd B. Skow film. Boring, not worth watching at all.
Posted by: Houstondon

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/07/14 08:40 AM

Originally Posted By: Jigaloo
Originally Posted By: Smokezilla
I respectfully disagree. I enjoy delivering a gape inducing shitpipe pounding as much as the next guy, but there are girls that were/are bad as fuck without ever having taken it in the knot. Jessie Andrews, Ash Hollywood, and while I know she finally took the plunge, Lexi was and still is amazing before she ever has her dumper pounded.


Jessie finally did it in an odd B. Skow film. Boring, not worth watching at all.


Yeah, she looked in pain and disgusted the very short time she was doing anal. In interviews, she claimed to do anal solely to win awards... (good luck with that)
Posted by: Jerkules

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/07/14 10:23 AM

Originally Posted By: Houstondon



Yeah, she looked in pain and disgusted


HOT!

I always confused her with other whores. Nothing about her stood out and caught my eye. This sounds like the most interesting thing she's done.
Posted by: delanoojos

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/07/14 06:56 PM

Got to go with Dakota Skye and Maddy a close second
Posted by: HillbillyHarry

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/09/14 08:01 PM

So the theory I created one night after some DMT recently that tattoos on porn girls relate to russian criminals and tattoos is just the rantings of a old man hallucinating?
Posted by: backdoorman

Re: AVN Nominees - 12/10/14 09:09 AM

Sounds reasonable to me........oh wait ! I resemble that remark.