Kurt Suckwood'

Posted by: MR WHIP

Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 01:44 AM

thiz; kid is ah' real cocksuka'h more'h than
Chriztian' Chromosome' XX .......good times




nice for; kurt'z avatar..
Posted by: katrina

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 05:27 AM

I would refer to him as Kurt Sexywood.
Posted by: TheBillyvassi

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 11:28 AM

Thats probably because your mother drank when she had you
Posted by: SuperDuperBored

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 11:45 AM

WTF!

Memo to self: Don't click on any thread that involves the name Lockwood as it will inevitably contain some form of tranny love.

Posted by: Sasha D. Cheynerat

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 12:04 PM

to quote holly from a previous thread on mr. cockwood:

Quote:

This is kinda funny... I recall Kurt pulling me aside at Erotica LA, insisting that he's not gay, but he just likes things up his ass. "And that doesn't make me gay," he firmly stated. "I don't have sex with men."



hmmm...maybe this does?

Posted by: Random

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 02:05 PM

Only faggots post pictures of faggots.
Posted by: vanessa

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 02:43 PM

Quote:

Only faggots post pictures of faggots.


One day an incredibly hot girl is going have sex with you, and she's going to give you a prostate massage. You'll find out that you sort of like it. What will you do afterwards, when the drugs wear off? Kill yourself because you've become gay? Kill the girl? Cry?
Posted by: Sasha D. Cheynerat

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 03:01 PM

Quote:

Only faggots post pictures of faggots.



so what are you waiting for?
Posted by: Random

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 03:38 PM

Interesting. It seems as though I've rankled both a man who wants to be a woman and a person who enjoys looking at photos of men having sex with men who want to be women.

Look, this is a forum for fans of heterosexual porn, yes? Hey, if you're gay, God bless you, I harbor no ill will towards you. But there's a place for such photos, and it's not here. I wouldn't go to a gay forum and wallpaper it with photos of heterosexual sex, so is it unreasonable to expect a link and a warning, rather than a photo or gif, when man-on-man sex is the subject being addressed? I don't think it is.
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 04:10 PM

Quote:

Look, this is a forum for fans of heterosexual porn, yes? Hey, if you're gay, God bless you, I harbor no ill will towards you. But there's a place for such photos, and it's not here. I wouldn't go to a gay forum and wallpaper it with photos of heterosexual sex, so is it unreasonable to expect a link and a warning, rather than a photo or gif, when man-on-man sex is the subject being addressed? I don't think it is.



That's the most reasonable thing that's been said on XPT in over a month.

EDIT: What's disturbing is that the inital photo has already been downloaded 10 times.
Posted by: TheBillyvassi

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 04:46 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Only faggots post pictures of faggots.


One day an incredibly hot girl is going have sex with you, and she's going to give you a prostate massage. You'll find out that you sort of like it. What will you do afterwards, when the drugs wear off? Kill yourself because you've become gay? Kill the girl? Cry?




i like having a female finger up my ass, getting rimmed
thats the extent of it ....women are my personal preference..
dont wanna blow my brains out....quite clear on the fact i dig on pussy , end of story

but when this misgonistic turd bag (KURT) comes on the board and picks fights and calls others "fags" or "gay" in the sense of being it a derogatory term

i find it fucking funny, hard times and odd choices have forced him to suck off random porn trannies and get fucked in the ass for what im sure isnt more then 6-700 bucks a pop


lets put this into perspective, anytime an asshole, gets fuck in theirs...to me thats ripe for humour
especially when they whore themselves out

sexual preference and politics aside.

i wish i could actually meet kurt, so i could see if the tranny heels have caused a callous on his chin, from being stuck underneath them now,on the porn ladder
Posted by: The Cynical Villain

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 06:54 PM

well i just lost my appetite.
Posted by: Bad Habit

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 11:00 PM

Quote:

Look, this is a forum for fans of heterosexual porn, yes?



Actually, no. It's a porn forum, period. There is no hetero, or homo, or anything else in the name xxxporntalk. Certainly you're not suggesting that we can only give Kurt Lockwood shit about his straight stuff and are not allowed to rip him apart over his t-girl or other gay stuff? I would think that, at the very least, since he does a lot of straight work, it would open up his entire credit list to criticism here.

If it's related to porn, then I would guess it's appropriate for this board.
(it would be nice, however, for a little warning before stumbling into some of this gross shit)
Posted by: vanessa

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 11:27 PM

Quote:

Hey, if you're gay, God bless you, I harbor no ill will towards you.


What a lowlife. First you call people "faggots" which is a derogatory term like "nigger", then you call me a man and then you seriously have the nerve to think of your shitty, little self as someone who has no problems?

I like your whining about offensive (to you) material in a 'Kurt Suckwood' thread. What did you expect when you clicked on it?
Posted by: vanessa

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/26/08 11:35 PM

Quote:


That's the most reasonable thing that's been said on XPT in over a month.



"When did Jim B abandon reason for madness?"

Posted by: Random

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/27/08 01:10 AM

I have no idea why I'm even bothering to respond, but...

Quote:


First you call people "faggots" which is a derogatory term like "nigger"



Gay. Donut-Puncher. Sodomite. Ass Goblin. Queer. Pillow-Biter. It's all the same to me. It could have just as easily been any of the above words. Admittedly, I didn't stop to consider the feelings of one of the two transsexuals on the board before I went with the "Homosexual Nigger".

Additionally, "faggot" gets tossed around here pretty liberally. If it was that shattering for you to read, you'd have stopped frequenting XPT a long time ago. Quit being such a drama queen (ooooh, snap!).

Quote:

then you call me a man



Well, aren't you?

Quote:

and then you seriously have the nerve to think of your shitty, little self as someone who has no problems?



Have I ever chased you around the board, attacking you for who you are or what you've done? For that matter, have I done that to Christian or that other shemale that posts here from time to time? Have I wished death on you, or AIDS, like a half-dozen other posters? No, I haven't. Again, quit being such a drama queen. If I'm anything, it's tactless. A person can be tactless and tolerant.


Quote:

What did you expect when you clicked on it?




News. Perhaps a funny anecdote. Just because I prefer not to see photos of trannies plowing men (and I know I'm not in the minority), it doesn't mean that I don't find news of Lockwood's shenanigans absolutely hilarious.
Posted by: freestylah

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/27/08 06:49 AM

Quote:

Additionally, "faggot" gets tossed around here pretty liberally.



And that makes it okay for you to do that as well?

Furthermore, you should know by now what you can expect at XPT. So, stop whining please. Thank you.

Have a nice day!
Posted by: I Love Moose Knuckle

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/27/08 09:49 PM

Wow Random, where do I begin?

First, did you really say that when you were clicking on the link you were expecting news?? There are better sources for news than XPT. Try CNN or MSN.

Second, everyone knows that gay shit is posted on here all the time. It would be very weird to have decency guidelines on a porn board.

Third, you also made reference to not posting man on man pics in your first message. If you look at what lockwood is sucking, you will notice that even though there is a dick, there are also tits. The porn world does not categorize this as man on man. I will let you look up the proper category.

Fourth, the fact that you capitalize God gives us all the information we need to know about you and the religious background that led to your homophobic comments.

Be more open minded please. That is all.
Posted by: Walrus

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/27/08 10:46 PM

Has anyone found out how much child support is in Spain? Didn't he abandon the kid and the mother to come back? Maybe this is why he's out of the closet now.
Posted by: safado

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/28/08 06:12 AM

Quote:


Third, you also made reference to not posting man on man pics in your first message. If you look at what lockwood is sucking, you will notice that even though there is a dick, there are also tits. The porn world does not categorize this as man on man. I will let you look up the proper category.



Porn also categorizes piss as female ejaculate but everyone knows it's really just piss.

Quote:

Fourth, the fact that you capitalize God gives us all the information we need to know about you and the religious background that led to your homophobic comments.



What, that he knows you're supposed to capitalize nouns?

Posted by: the unknown pervert

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/28/08 06:24 AM

Quasar really hits one out of the park talking about Lockwood on ADT here.

"Truthfully, I really have nothing against this guy anymore but hypocrisy pisses me off to no end. Be it Jimmy Swaggart piously telling everyone how to live their life and then getting caught banging a hooker in a motel or Lockwood boasting incessantly about his alpha-male status and then sucking off a tranny like he's trying to find out how many licks it takes to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop. The reason both are objects of scorn and ridicule is not because of their sexual choices but because of their hypocrisy in making them. Lockwood isn't a douchebag because he's giving himself an enema right now in preparation for his scene tomorrow, he's a douchebag because he's gone out of his way to threaten physical violence upon anyone who has even joked about his probable homosexual proclivity. Kurt was actually a good performer until his ego got so big that he started demanding extra money for being featured in the Behind the Scenes footage. No one is ridiculing him because he's a homo, they're doing it because he denies he's a homo despite having tasted semen not by accident. The following quote is fictitious but one that I feel summarizes what this argument is about;
Kurt: "What did you call me? Don't you know that I'm great at everything I do and that I make Bill Gates money fucking hot chicks 7 days a week? As soon as this dude blows a load in my ass I'm gonna beat the shit out of you for suggesting that I'm gay!!!"
Delusional is the only word that comes to mind. Once again, this isn't about homophobia. It's about an egomaniac burning every bridge he ever crossed. Truthfully, I wish him the best. I hope that he is very successful playing for the other team and I hope that he is now comfortable with who he is. I really mean that. There is no shame in preferring the same sex. The only shame is in denying it with your eyelashes pasted shut by semen."
Posted by: Gigi

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/28/08 08:57 AM

Quote:

"There is no shame in preferring the same sex. The only shame is in denying it with your eyelashes pasted shut by semen."


Posted by: The Ghost Of Wanker Wang

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/28/08 10:46 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Only faggots post pictures of faggots.


One day an incredibly hot girl is going have sex with you, and she's going to give you a prostate massage. You'll find out that you sort of like it. What will you do afterwards, when the drugs wear off? Kill yourself because you've become gay? Kill the girl? Cry?




His drug of choice is obviously tranny-cock. I happen to have insider info that the guy is calling and begging trannys to hook up daily, and has even traveled for tranny cock to other states.
Posted by: I Love Moose Knuckle

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/29/08 01:29 PM

Quote:

Quote:


Third, you also made reference to not posting man on man pics in your first message. If you look at what lockwood is sucking, you will notice that even though there is a dick, there are also tits. The porn world does not categorize this as man on man. I will let you look up the proper category.



Porn also categorizes piss as female ejaculate but everyone knows it's really just piss.

Quote:

Fourth, the fact that you capitalize God gives us all the information we need to know about you and the religious background that led to your homophobic comments.



What, that he knows you're supposed to capitalize nouns?





Agreed on the first point

I should have explained the other point a little bit clearer. The basic psychology is that when people capitalize God, it is usually done because they believe in God. The capitalization refers to a particular thing to them. You will not find Atheist writer's capitalizing it since they do not believe. Furthermore, the capitaliation of God is a western religious thing to do. Polytheists would obviously not agree with the term God refering to a specific thing, but they would think Gods would be the appropriate phrasing. Sorry to be so fucking boring. Just wanted to clarify.
Posted by: Gunker

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/29/08 08:45 PM

Quote:

I should have explained the other point a little bit clearer. The basic psychology is that when people capitalize God, it is usually done because they believe in God. The capitalization refers to a particular thing to them. You will not find Atheist writer's capitalizing it since they do not believe. Furthermore, the capitaliation of God is a western religious thing to do. Polytheists would obviously not agree with the term God refering to a specific thing, but they would think Gods would be the appropriate phrasing. Sorry to be so fucking boring. Just wanted to clarify.





Posted by: TheBillyvassi

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/29/08 08:47 PM

Quote:

Quote:

I should have explained the other point a little bit clearer. The basic psychology is that when people capitalize God, it is usually done because they believe in God. The capitalization refers to a particular thing to them. You will not find Atheist writer's capitalizing it since they do not believe. Furthermore, the capitaliation of God is a western religious thing to do. Polytheists would obviously not agree with the term God refering to a specific thing, but they would think Gods would be the appropriate phrasing. Sorry to be so fucking boring. Just wanted to clarify.











Oh that is classic....wow.

Posted by: Bornyo

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 02/29/08 09:13 PM

I'm glad you did that Gunker, and so well.
Posted by: I Love Moose Knuckle

Re: Kurt Suckwood' - 03/01/08 01:05 PM

Quote:

Quote:

I should have explained the other point a little bit clearer. The basic psychology is that when people capitalize God, it is usually done because they believe in God. The capitalization refers to a particular thing to them. You will not find Atheist writer's capitalizing it since they do not believe. Furthermore, the capitaliation of God is a western religious thing to do. Polytheists would obviously not agree with the term God refering to a specific thing, but they would think Gods would be the appropriate phrasing. Sorry to be so fucking boring. Just wanted to clarify.









Crap. Is there any extra credit I can do?