List of Porn Banned in Canada

Posted by: Anonymous

List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/30/07 06:06 PM

From TSG, here's a partial list of titles banned by Ottawa's Prohibited Importations Unit.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/1030071canada1.html

No JM titles, one Stagliano and one Evasive Angel title.
Posted by: Ivor Biggun

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/30/07 06:18 PM

My condolences to the Canadians for missing out on the joys of Chloroform Rape and Diarrhea Bukkake.
Posted by: gia jordan

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/30/07 06:26 PM

No Brandon Iron or Erik Everhard titles, natch. They can't ban their own.
Posted by: zenman

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/30/07 06:37 PM

Quote:

My condolences to the Canadians for missing out on the joys of Chloroform Rape and Diarrhea Bukkake.




Posted by: Uomo Grassissimo!!

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/30/07 06:45 PM

Quote:

No Brandon Iron or Erik Everhard titles, natch. They can't ban their own.




Some one in Canada would have to BUY ONE for it to be "screened" by the authorities.
Canadians might have too much taste to order any Iron/Everhard productions.




Could be a reason why their dollar is faring better against ours, too ...
Posted by: Vizzle

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/30/07 07:17 PM

That "Dark Chapel" title is anime for god's sake...how can you ban a cartoon???

Posted by: Uomo Grassissimo!!

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/30/07 07:23 PM









Wait 'til the "unrated" Simpson movies goes to DVD in Canada ...
Posted by: Brandon_Iron

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/30/07 11:40 PM

Quote:

My condolences to the Canadians for missing out on the joys of Chloroform Rape and Diarrhea Bukkake.




My Chloroform Bukkake mashup dvd was cancelled after all the talent fell asleep. No work ethic whatsoever. Even Tone Capone fell asleep halfway through a fight with some dude.

I think the Diarrhea Rape mashup will go much smoother.
Posted by: Soopergrizz

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/31/07 10:04 AM

Brandon, that was pretty fucking funny.

Let me apologize in advance for the Burglarian nature of this post.

Canada Customs is supposed to make a determination on each item it suspects of being over the line. In some cases, distributors send product to them ahead of time to get a pre-determination. In other cases, items which have been determined to be criminally obscene (by Custom's in-house team of non-legally trained blockheads) are put on a "cannot import list", such as the one you mention. If your item is not on that list, it does not mean it will get in.

Sometimes, Customs will simply target a store or distributor and block ALL of their product to force them out of business. This happened in Vancouver with the Little Sisters Bookstore - a gay and lesbian shop in the west end. One year, customs held all of their product, including heartsmart cookbooks and the like for 6 months so they had nothing to sell over the Christmas season.

One example of Canada Customs' idiocy is that anal sex has not been illegal in Canada in about 30 years, neither has the depiction of it; however, Canada Customs routinely denied importation of books containing images of anal sex - including drawings of anal sex.

The store sued the gov't and the case went up to the Supreme Court, which decided the store was being discriminated against by the government. For those of you with a deeply held interest in Canadian constitutional law, or a sleep disorder, CLICK HERE

From the Supreme Court's summary of the Trial judgment (reversed on appeal, and partially re-instated by the Supreme Court):

Quote:

After a lengthy trial the trial judge found not only that the Customs officials had wrongly delayed, confiscated, destroyed, damaged, prohibited or misclassified materials imported by the appellant bookstore on numerous occasions, but that these errors were caused by the “systemic targeting” of the store’s importations. He concluded that the Customs legislation infringed s. 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but was justified under s. 1. Although he denied a remedy under s. 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, the trial judge issued a declaration under s. 24(1) of the Charter that the Customs legislation had at times been construed and applied in a manner contrary to ss. 2(b) and 15(1) of the Charter.




An excerpt of the majority decision of the Supreme Court on discrimination in the law:

Quote:

While here it is the interests of the gay and lesbian community that were targeted, other vulnerable groups may similarly be at risk from overzealous censorship. The appellant bookstore was targeted because it was considered “different”. On a more general level, it is fundamentally unacceptable that expression which is free within the country can become stigmatized and harassed by government officials simply because it crosses an international boundary, and is thereby brought within the bailiwick of the Customs department. The appellants’ constitutional right to receive perfectly lawful gay and lesbian erotica should not be diminished by the fact their suppliers are, for the most part, located in the United States. Their freedom of expression does not stop at the border.





For general articles about the laws and the bookstore's fight Click here

Not only is our Supreme Court a lot wiser and more compassionate than the US "Brotherhood", our Chief Justice is smoking hot.

Here is a picture of her dressed for play, in front of a picture of her in her "work clothes"

Posted by: Bornyo

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/31/07 10:42 AM

Yet they try to disarm your citizens.
Posted by: Richard Hungwell

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/31/07 11:52 AM

Once again this place just Stumps the fucking shit out of me...


What fucking year do you think it is 1997....???


Its Two thousand and fucking seven,,,,Ever heard of the Inter-Net...????Canadians can watch German retards shit all over each other if they want,,,And a guy fucking a goat to boot..Any thing there little hearts desire.....
Posted by: da serb

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/31/07 12:09 PM

Quote:

Yet they try to disarm your citizens.




And God bless 'em for that...While, in my experience, this seems to be a scandalous view in the U.S., I firmly believe that private citizens have no valid reason to own a gun. Most people, at least in my social circle (university educated young professionals) hold the same view around here.

Hence, it is not that our legislators or judiciary are disarming us. It is rather that we would like to see all our fellow citizens disarmed. Our legislators and judiciary are merely acting on the will of the people. For further support of the argument, compare U.S. and Canadian murder rates.

Just sayin'...though I certainly understand the historical roots of American obsession with freedom to own firearms.
Posted by: Bornyo

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/31/07 12:19 PM

Canada's disarmament program is nothing to be proud of.
Posted by: da serb

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/31/07 12:29 PM

I think this is primarily an "intuition pump", emotive issue, and I'm not inclined to get into a discussion as I don't believe we can change each other's viewpoints via rational arguments. I respect your viewpoint, and the fact that that is the majority opinion in America. By the same stroke, I am very proud to live in a country where the majority sticks to my viewpoint on this particular topic.

Posted by: Bornyo

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/31/07 12:36 PM

Yeah I'm not going to argue it here either. Some blame Guns, I blame Chickenmaster

Quote:

Federal gun registry has not improved public safety despite costing taxpayers more than $2 billion

VANCOUVER, July 5 /CNW/ - Canada's homicide rate and number of
gang-related murders has increased since the federal government's firearms
registry and licensing program was implemented, an indication that the program
has failed to improve public safety, according to Hubris in the North, The
Canadian Firearms Registry, a new report from independent research
organization The Fraser Institute.
"In 1995, the government promised Canadians that the gun registry would
reduce total criminal violence, suicide and domestic abuse, not just gun
violence," said Gary Mauser, author of the report, senior fellow with The
Fraser Institute, and a professor at Simon Fraser University.
"But the legislation has failed to do that, primarily because it relies
upon public-health research to justify a moralistic approach to firearms that
exaggerates the danger of citizens owning firearms through pseudoscientific
research methods."
Hubris in the North, The Canadian Firearms Registry details the history
of Canadian gun legislation and examines the trends in criminal violence and
suicide to see if the gun registry has been effective in accomplishing its
stated goals.
The gun registry and its supporting legislation were introduced in 1995
by the Liberal government. Justice Minister Allan Rock said at the time that
registering guns and licensing their owners would save lives by reducing
criminal violence, domestic violence, suicide, and firearm accidents.
But Mauser's analysis shows that public safety has not improved. He finds
that overall criminal violence and suicide rates have continued their
long-term decline with the violent crime rate falling by about four per cent.
Yet the homicide rate has actually increased by nine per cent since the
registry was implemented. No persuasive link could be found between the
firearm registry and these changes.
"I don't think you can credit the gun registry for the decline in
criminal violence because the data indicate the drop began well before
firearms registration was introduced," Mauser said. "Moreover, homicide and
criminal violence in general have fallen more in the United States during the
same time period than in Canada, so it's hard to imagine the gun registry
having a measurable impact in this environment."
One of the most striking findings is that gang-related homicides and
homicides involving handguns have increased substantially.
"Gang violence typically involves handguns and although handguns have
been registered since the 1930s, this has not reduced the level of their
criminal misuse," Mauser said. "The gun registry had no effect on homicide
rates and was particularly ineffective against gang activity."
The report suggests that the rational for the registry program is based
on faulty research.
"The government's approach to public safety relied on an analysis of
firearms and violence that greatly exaggerated the dangers of firearm
ownership," Mauser said.
"This misrepresentation stemmed from public-health researchers who
ignored basic scientific principles in favour of advocacy. These activists
drew conclusions that were not supported by their research studies and they
compounded their errors by recommending legislative solutions that fell
outside the boundaries of their research. Such studies are not properly
scientific but use the scientific trappings of research to prove claims rather
than testing hypotheses."
The report points out that research to date has not shown that sweeping
gun laws are effective at reducing general homicide or suicide rates. These
research findings remain largely unacknowledged in the public-health
community. The low incidence rate of firearms misuse means that there are
large numbers of false positives with substantial attendant financial costs,
as well as important implications for democratic society.
"We lose much of our inherited democratic freedoms if we treat mature
citizens as if they were helpless patients rather than responsible adults,"
Mauser said.
Despite its estimated $2 billion cost to date, the firearms registry
remains notably incomplete and has an error rate that remains embarrassingly
high. As a result of its many failures, particularly its failure to reduce
gang violence or stop senseless killings such as the recent occurrences at
Dawson College and Mayerthorpe, Alberta, the firearms registry has not been
able to win the trust of either the public or the police.
Mauser pointed out that Auditor General Sheila Fraser complained that she
could not get all of the necessary financial information during an audit of
the registry and summarized her review of the books by saying the registry had
one of the largest cost overruns her office had ever seen.
"Clearly, the evidence shows that the registry has failed Canadians. It
has failed to reduce gang violence or stop senseless killings. So why then,
should we trust it, and why should we continue to fund it?" Mauser said.


Posted by: Soopergrizz

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/31/07 12:39 PM

Handguns kill people, that's what they're for. Fewer handguns = fewer killed people.

We can agree to disagree, since we have had this discussion before.

As for the comments about 'product' being available on the internet - that's kind of the point of the excerpt from the Supreme Court. They said that protected speech doesn't become less protected simply because it has to cross a border.
Posted by: Soopergrizz

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/31/07 02:21 PM

Just to clarify, the attempt at setting up a weapons registry was a colossal fuckup by the last government (and has been scrapped by the current one).

The problem was the government trying to appease gun owners instead of just confiscating anything but shotguns and hunting rifles.
Posted by: Handful

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/31/07 05:47 PM

We've got 18 year old French whores
Posted by: Uomo Grassissimo!!

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 10/31/07 07:43 PM

Quote:

Fewer handguns = fewer killed people.





Posted by: Handful

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 11/01/07 04:20 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Fewer handguns = fewer killed people.










In theory, yes. Unfortunately handgun crimes are generally committed with unregistered, black market firearms. The purpose of the registry is beaurocratic and does little to curb gun violence.
Posted by: the unknown pervert

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 11/01/07 04:42 PM

Fewer automobiles=fewer people killed in car accidents.
Fewer planes=fewer people killed in plane crashes.
Fewer houses=fewer people killed in house fires.

If you are going to use the fewer x=fewer deaths caused by x as the basis of your argument, you might as will just ban everything ever invented. No gun has ever jumped off a table and started shooting people without being attached to someone's finger. Don't blame the tool, blame the fool using it. No one blames the hammer when some goof mashes his thumb while using one.
Posted by: Uomo Grassissimo!!

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 11/01/07 05:03 PM

There's no use for that tool but to kill people.
Posted by: the unknown pervert

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 11/01/07 05:29 PM

Have you forgotten this already?
Posted by: Soopergrizz

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 11/01/07 05:38 PM

Quote:

If you are going to use the fewer x=fewer deaths caused by x as the basis of your argument...




The basis of my argument was the entire statement:

Quote:

Handguns kill people, that's what they're for. Fewer handguns = fewer killed people.




Cars, planes, fried peanut butter sandwiches were not created with the objective of killing people efficiently (and in the case of the last example, it is particularly inefficient).

spellcheck'd
Posted by: papercut

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 11/01/07 07:58 PM

I think I got it...fewer handguns = fewer people killed by handguns but not necessarily fewer people killed in total.
Posted by: Richard Hungwell

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 11/01/07 09:38 PM

Jesus Fuck....!

They should change the name here to Dip-Shit central....

What the fuck does any of this have to do with "list of banned porn in Canada"....???

You people are retards...!
Start your own fucking thread about gun control....
Posted by: Handful

Re: List of Porn Banned in Canada - 11/02/07 04:51 AM

Quote:

What the fuck does any of this have to do with "list of banned porn in Canada"....???




Whether it's porn or guns, raiding coffers will not make the problem go away. Illegal titles continue to exist here as do illegal guns.

Titles from that list I would like to see include:

Chloroform Rape (of course)
French Women Fucking Young Girls 3
Hobbled
Horny Black Mothers and Daughters
Mother Daughter Incest vol. 1 and 6
Piss and Cum Cocktail
Diarrhea Bukkake
Diarrhea Madness!