Feds' Porn "Ultimatum"

Posted by: Anonymous

Feds' Porn "Ultimatum" - 08/19/07 04:40 PM

Sounds like 2257 with Roid Rage. From NY POST

FEDS' PORN ULTIMATUM

August 19, 2007 -- Ron Jeremy, Jenna Jameson - get ready to stand and be counted.

The Department of Justice wants to come up with an official list of every porn star in America - and slap stiff penalties on producers who don't cooperate.

The new rules, proposed under the Adam Walsh Child Safety and Protection Act, would require blue-movie makers to keep photos, stage names, professional names, maiden names, aliases, nicknames and ages on file for the inspection of the department's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section.

"The identity of every performer is critical to determining and ensuring that no performer is a minor," according to the new proposal.

The adult film industry plans to challenge the new rule as a violation of the First Amendment, said Paul Cambria, a lawyer for Hustler and other adult film companies.

He sees it as a way to harass legitimate stag-film producers.

"If they can't get you for obscenity, they'll get you for violating record-keeping," he said. Such a violation would carry a five-year penalty.

The proposed rule would require porn producers to give the title of the video or magazine, or the Web address where the actor appears.

The Department of Justice has shown some sensitivity for the performers' privacy, however. All information not essential to proving their age and identity, like phone numbers and addresses, can be withheld.

Distributors of foreign pornography aren't off the hook - they must still produce a copy of the foreign actor's identification card. The department estimates that there are 500,000 Web sites, 200 DVD producers and 5,000 businesses nationwide that would be subject to the new rule.

The department did not respond to requests for comment, but in its proposal suggested that the benefits outweighed any negative impact on the porn industry.

"The benefit of the rule is that children will be better protected from exploitation in the production of visual depictions of sexually explicit conduct by ensuring that only those who are at least 18 years of age perform in such depictions. The costs to the industry include slightly higher record-keeping costs," the agency argued.

+++

So when do they start giving out the numbered tattoos?
Posted by: Moxie

Re: Feds' Porn "Ultimatum" - 08/19/07 06:34 PM

A list? Sounds like the XXX-men. Who will be porn's Charles Xavier? Perhaps a school for the pererted is in order.
Posted by: Stevie Why

Re: Feds' Porn "Ultimatum" - 08/19/07 07:33 PM

Quote:

The new rules, proposed under the Adam Walsh Child Safety and Protection Act, would require blue-movie makers to keep photos, stage names, professional names, maiden names, aliases, nicknames and ages on file for the inspection of the department's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section.




Sounds like 2257 as it currently stands.

Quote:

A list? Sounds like the XXX-men. Who will be porn's Charles Xavier? Perhaps a school for the pererted is in order.





I love XXX-Men...I call being porn's version of Banshee; complete with red hair AND the x-plosive mouth True Believers!!
Posted by: k1ng

Re: Feds' Porn "Ultimatum" - 08/19/07 07:45 PM

Quote:

Feds' Porn "Ultimatum"




Damn. I thought this thread was about the porn version of "The Bourne Ultimatum"
Julia Stiles and Joan Allen
Posted by: Anonymous

Re: Feds' Porn "Ultimatum" - 08/19/07 07:48 PM

A porn trilogy of that series could really kick ass. But, like as not they'd fuck it up.
Posted by: The Ghost Is Toast

Re: Feds' Porn "Ultimatum" - 08/20/07 02:04 AM

Quote:

A list? Sounds like the XXX-men. Who will be porn's Charles Xavier? Perhaps a school for the pererted is in order.




Paging Dr. Da Burglar...

Wheelchair. Check
Shaven head. Check
Vast personal wealth. Check
Situated on East Coast. Check

...it's all suddenly falling into place!

Seriously though, 'Da Burg's School For Gifted Wayward Porn Chicks' could be your lasting legacy. Just wait until Sasha Grey follows in Sharon Mitchell's footsteps, and you can hire her and continually refer to her as 'Dr. Grey'.

AC Cream could be The Blob...the possibilities are endless!
Posted by: Hyde

Re: Feds' Porn "Ultimatum" - 08/20/07 04:01 AM

Quote:


The benefit of the rule is that children will be better protected from exploitation in the production of visual depictions of sexually explicit conduct by ensuring that only those who are at least 18 years of age perform in such depictions.





Who the fuck is producing this shit? Is this really an epidemic? A clear and present danger... comparable to porn WMDS? [ The Feds have "reliable intelligence" that they're out there, so they're gonna invade Chatsworth to "protect" our children. ]
Whoever may be out there making this shit, they sure as hell aren't in Porn Valley. They're all in East Buttfuck, SD, making home videos of the neighbor's kids strapped to a basement ping-pong table.
Way to go after the bad guys Gonzalez!
Posted by: Smartt

Re: Feds' Porn "Ultimatum" - 08/20/07 04:15 AM

How V.
Posted by: jim dangle

Re: Feds' Porn "Ultimatum" - 08/20/07 11:15 AM

Just give it a few weeks and Alberto G won't even recall issuing this ultimatum. And then everything will be business as usual.
Posted by: Dick Dastardly

Re: Feds' Porn "Ultimatum" - 08/20/07 07:26 PM

Quote:

I love XXX-Men...I call being porn's version of Banshee; complete with red hair AND the x-plosive mouth True Believers!!





I want Beast, because I'm one hairy motherfucker.
Posted by: Moxie

Re: Feds' Porn "Ultimatum" - 08/20/07 07:56 PM

In the porn version the mansion at at 1407 Graymalkin Lane has a yellow couch.