"Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Entertain

Posted by: Saevus Maximus

"Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Entertain - 03/12/07 02:22 PM


Bill O'Reilly: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Entertainment' Without Government Intrusion"


Morality in Media o'riled up over statement

--press release


NEW YORK [PRNewswire-USNewswire] -- In his column, "Politicians for Porn: The sad decline of San Francisco" (N.Y. Post, 3/9/07), Bill O'Reilly criticized San Francisco's mayor for proclaiming February 23 as "Colt Studio Day in San Francisco."

Colt Studios is a "gay porn outfit" that produces hardcore pornography. Mr. O'Reilly also stated his belief that "adults should be able to consume so-called 'adult entertainment' without government intrusion."

MIM President Robert Peters had the following comments in regard to the
latter remark:

You are right to describe hardcore pornography as "so-called 'adult
entertainment'" because as former FBI obscenity investigator Roger Young
stated in an interview (published at http://www.obscenitycrimes.org Porn Problem & Solutions page):

"People in the pornography industry do not like the word pornography
... The term 'adult material' was put forth by them to soften it, to try to
make it more acceptable in the community. They'd rather say that this is
mainstream, run-of-the-mill, adult material, not pornography, because they
know that 'pornography' came from two Greek words, 'porne' and 'graphos,'
which literally translated means 'the writing of prostitutes.'"

In the real world, the term "adult" (when used to describe pornography)
encompasses everything from soft-core pornography (e.g., a Playboy magazine
"foldout") to hard-core pornography of every description. Even assuming for
the sake of argument that children and un-consenting adults could be
shielded from the flood of hardcore pornography, the production,
distribution and consumption of (and addiction to) such material would
still contribute to:

-- The epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS

-- The decline in marriages and the breakup of marriages

-- On-the-job sexual harassment and a decline in worker productivity

-- Sex crimes against adults and children

-- The breakdown of morality and erosion of decency

Thankfully, there are still obscenity laws on the books at both the
federal and state levels that can be enforced against hardcore pornography.

The Supreme Court has also repeatedly upheld these laws against various
"constitutional challenges" brought by the pornographers and the ACLU. You
are, of course, entitled to your opinion; but perhaps in the future you
could express your support for "adult entertainment" in a way that will
enable your readers and listeners to more fully comprehend what you do
support. I suggest the following language:

"I usually disagree with the ACLU, but on the subject of pornography we
think alike for the most part. I also believe the First Amendment should
protect the right of adult Americans to produce and distribute hardcore
pornographic materials that depict, among other things, adultery, the
degradation, rape and torture of women, male rape, the sexual exploitation
of children (as long as actual children aren't depicted), the consumption
of urine and feces, the sexual union of humans with animals, the sexual
union of siblings and of parents and children (as long as they are all at
least 18 years old), men exposing themselves to women in public places,
prostitution, someone's eighteen year old girl having sex with a dozen boys
at a college fraternity, unsafe anal sex galore, and more.

"Furthermore, I choose to ignore the evidence linking pornography to
sexual crimes against children and adults. I don't care how many marriages
pornography destroys. I don't think it is all that bad if kids get their
hands on this stuff. They have to learn about sex too. Nor do I care about
morality or about maintaining a decent society.

"Nor do I care what the America people or their elected representatives
in Congress think. Or what the Supreme Court has said about obscenity. With
five Supreme Court Justices who think they can interpret the Constitution
any way they please, the ACLU and I can set the pornographers and their
customers free from government intrusion.

"This is what America is all about."
MORALITY IN MEDIA works through constitutional means to curb traffic in
obscenity.
Posted by: MoronBoy

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 03:00 PM

Quote:

Mr. O'Reilly also stated his belief that "adults should be able to consume so-called 'adult entertainment' without government intrusion."





... dear God, I'm agreeing with Bill O'reilly.
Posted by: Soopergrizz

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 03:31 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Mr. O'Reilly also stated his belief that "adults should be able to consume so-called 'adult entertainment' without government intrusion."





... dear God, I'm agreeing with Bill O'reilly.





Actually, O'Reilly is still a fatuous, lying sack of shit, and the apparently 'wise' comments were taken out of context. He was criticizing the city for honouring porn producers, and suggested that it leads to child molestation:

Bottom line, You don't need a friend like Bill-O, clearly one of the worst people in the world.

Quote:

San Francisco Values: The Sequel
By Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com
Thursday, Mar 08, 2007


A couple of weeks ago in San Francisco, the following proclamation was issued: "Be it resolved that I, Gavin Newsom, Mayor of the City and County of San Francisco, congratulate Colt Studios on the occasion of their (sic) 40th anniversary and proclaim February 23, 2007 as Colt Studio Day in San Francisco!"


That evening the Colt folks held a big party in the City by the Bay, attended by State Assemblyman Mark Leno and other local dignitaries.


There is, however, one small problem with all this, and it is spelled out on the Colt website, which states: "Come inside to experience the hottest man-on-man action!"


Somehow, I don't think they're talking about the World Wrestling Association here.


No, Colt Studios is a major gay porn outfit that markets hard core films all over the world. There are many movies available including the "legendary bodies series - the pinnacle of masculine erotica."


So the logical question becomes why, exactly, does Colt Studios rate a "day" in San Francisco? I put that to Mayor Newsom who said he didn't really know about the proclamation. Somebody in his office just signed his name without telling him, according to the Mayor. In the future, he said, he'd "review" the proclamations himself.


Might be a good idea.


But Assemblyman Leno was aghast that I would ask about this. He told the San Francisco Chronicle that "the owners of the studio are taxpaying, law-abiding San Francisco employers who promote safe sex."


Leno went on to tell the newspaper that the Colt "products" had "contributed to his development as a gay man."


This, of course, is the same Mark Leno who torpedoed tough legislation to punish child molesters. The good folks in California had to put a referendum on the ballot in order to pass "Jessica's Law" because Leno and his cronies blocked it in the legislature.


Mark Leno also had no problem with the San Francisco Board of Supervisors passing an ordinance banning military recruiting in city schools. Nor did he object to the supervisors passing a resolution condemning a Christian youth rally at AT&T Park, the home of the Giants. The Supervisors called the rally "anti-gay and anti-choice."


When my book Culture Warrior was released last fall, a number of critics put forth that I exaggerated the agenda of the secular-progressive (S-P) movement. On the basis of what's happening in San Francisco, I was naïve. The S-P's are crazier then I thought.


I mean, think about it. Even if you believe, as I do, that adults should be able to consume so-called "adult entertainment" without government intrusion, don't children live in San Francisco these days? "Hey, Louie, the mayor just said it's gay porn day. Do we have to go to school?"


San Francisco is one of America's great urban showplaces, but the city has been hijacked by radical politicians who are destroying it. Mayor Newsom is in alcohol rehab after having an affair with his best friend's wife, the homeless situation is out of control because the city gives everybody cash, and now these loons are honoring pornographers.

What's next? Barry Bonds steroids day?




Posted by: k1ng

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 03:39 PM

Quote:

and suggested that it leads to child molestation




where did O'Reilly say that? if you're talking about this quote -

Quote:

the flood of hardcore pornography, the production,
distribution and consumption of (and addiction to) such material would
still contribute to:

-- Sex crimes against adults and children




I think that is attributed to the other guy, MIM President Robert Peters

edited to clarify
Posted by: Soopergrizz

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 04:10 PM

Quote:

I mean, think about it. Even if you believe, as I do, that adults should be able to consume so-called "adult entertainment" without government intrusion, don't children live in San Francisco these days?




Who cares if children live in SF? Why is that in any way relevant to any of the issues?



Posted by: k1ng

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 04:38 PM

Quote:

Quote:

I mean, think about it. Even if you believe, as I do, that adults should be able to consume so-called "adult entertainment" without government intrusion, don't children live in San Francisco these days?




Who cares if children live in SF? Why is that in any way relevant to any of the issues?






If you don't see the potential for problems with young children being exposed to a day marked to celebrate a gay porn studio then nothing I say will change that. Children grow up fast enough as it is without having to explain why their city is celebrating February 23 as Colt Studio Day and what Colt Studio is.
Posted by: k1ng

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 04:47 PM

If it were "JM Productions Day" that would be an entirely different matter.
Posted by: Willie D

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 04:52 PM

Ligers.
Posted by: gia jordan

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 05:13 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I mean, think about it. Even if you believe, as I do, that adults should be able to consume so-called "adult entertainment" without government intrusion, don't children live in San Francisco these days?




Who cares if children live in SF? Why is that in any way relevant to any of the issues?






If you don't see the potential for problems with young children being exposed to a day marked to celebrate a gay porn studio then nothing I say will change that. Children grow up fast enough as it is without having to explain why their city is celebrating February 23 as Colt Studio Day and what Colt Studio is.




There's a gay pride parade in most major cities. Its not like 'Take your son to work at the gloryhole day' will be commonplace.
Posted by: k1ng

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 05:57 PM

Quote:

'Take your son to work at the gloryhole day'




It's funny you should mention that, that's a Colt Studio title and I think they are up to #5 in the series.
Posted by: Uomo Grassissimo!!

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 09:09 PM

Quote:

If you don't see the potential for problems with young children being exposed to a day marked to celebrate a gay porn studio then nothing I say will change that. Children grow up fast enough as it is without having to explain why their city is celebrating February 23 as Colt Studio Day and what Colt Studio is.




While I don't think exposure at a young age translates to actions, I have to question WHY any city is going to honor a porn studio.

I could see if it was in 'bumfuck' Nevada and it was the only industry in the town, but SF has alot going on.

Could this be like one of those NYC things? In NYC the Mayor declares days for people, etc. But, no one knows about whose day it is.

I had a friend who was honored with a "day" in her name at City Hall under Dinkins. The day was announced. She got her plaque. They took some pictures. Next.

She wasn't 1st or last. There were like a dozen of so people whose 'day' it was. And, I doubt over 100 people in the city knew it.

So if they have a 'Tuna Can' or 'Fox Mag' day [the only 2 company posters I recall from NYC], no one would have to tell their kids about it UNTIL the POST shows up and FRONT PAGE [Mia Rose AHFD grabbing her ankle .... it's for the kids!]
Posted by: Moxie

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 09:19 PM

If government can support porn, it should be able to regulate porn. Keep government out of my porn.
Posted by: pinupmutant

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 09:27 PM

Quote:



While I don't think exposure at a young age translates to actions, I have to question WHY any city is going to honor a porn studio.

I could see if it was in 'bumfuck' Nevada and it was the only industry in the town, but SF has alot going on.





You've basically answered your own question. We're talking about San Francisco here, a dysfunctional city full of ridiculous people clinging to a "counter culture" reputation that was earned forty years ago. It's as if the town of Northampton, MA decided to celebrate a Hairy Muffdiving Day.
Posted by: Willie D

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 09:41 PM

I love Frisco, it gave us the Mitchell Brothers, mental and fratricidal, but still hip enough. Also the North Beach Restaurant, Aliotos', the City Lights Bookstore, and Cha Cha Cha on Haight & Shrader.
Posted by: k1ng

Re: "Adults Should Be Able To Consume 'Adult Enter - 03/12/07 09:54 PM

My life partner went to San Francisco and all I got was this lousy Colt Studio t-shirt.