Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene
Posted by: mypornoreview
Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 12:06 PM
I just saw a scene with Luscious Lopez with Kayla Cox a tranny with 3 other guys. They were doing bareback gay anal and vaginal with Luscious. All the guys fucked the tranny then fucked Luscious.
That's pretty fucking disgusting.
Posted by: metal church
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 12:49 PM
What is your point?
Posted by: ChairmanMiaow
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 01:37 PM
and why were you watching it?
Posted by: DuckHunt
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 01:42 PM
I saw a bird fly into a wall.
Posted by: mypornoreview
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 02:05 PM
I watched it as part of review videos...
Why am I posting it?? Because it is dangerous and high risk for other performers.
Posted by: Cumwhipper
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 02:28 PM
If all performers are tested regularly, why is this more high-risk than any other combination?
Posted by: Heyyou
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 02:32 PM
Posted by: mypornoreview
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 03:25 PM
Quote:
If all performers are tested regularly, why is this more high-risk than any other combination?
Being tested regularly isn't sure proof. Let's say she caught something that day and 2 days later she went to another scene and shot and spread the disease even though she had a clean test that she took 2 weeks ago.
Can the test (2 weeks old) assure that she didn't catch anything after the day she shot with the tranny and bisexual guys?
Posted by: Soopergrizz
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 04:04 PM
I thought the issue was people doing Gay for Pay BB 'privates' and then cross-polluting into the Hetero side of the business.
If you only BB fuck other tested people, what difference does it make if you hatefuck the ass of Kelly Wells or Ryan Knox (well, what difference with respect to spreading the HIV)
?
Posted by: christianxxx
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 04:41 PM
Quote:
Quote:
If all performers are tested regularly, why is this more high-risk than any other combination?
Being tested regularly isn't sure proof. Let's say she caught something that day and 2 days later she went to another scene and shot and spread the disease even though she had a clean test that she took 2 weeks ago.
Can the test (2 weeks old) assure that she didn't catch anything after the day she shot with the tranny and bisexual guys?
you are a dumbass......thats the risk we take as performers. you are only as good as your last test. you dont ask people..."hey who have you been fucking since your test?" you trust the people you work with to be safe in their endeavors, both private and public. luscious lopez is no more a threat than penny flame or kelly wells or eva angelina or gia paloma or anyone other girl with a good test.
you get dumber and dumber with each post bro...seriously.
Posted by: Charlie Malloy
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 06:28 PM
Quote:
you trust the people you work with to be safe in their endeavors, both private and public.
Kidding and sarcasm aside, I find this a lot to ask or expect.
No?
Surely, we've both met some people we might not feel confident trusting...or hauling our garbage, for that mattter.
Posted by: Ivor Biggun
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 09:09 PM
Quote:
Quote:
you trust the people you work with to be safe in their endeavors, both private and public.
Kidding and sarcasm aside, I find this a lot to ask or expect.
No?
Surely, we've both met some people we might not feel confident trusting...or hauling our garbage, for that mattter.
I agree. It's more realistic to say that rather than trusting people, you take a calculated risk based on the slim probablity of them having picked up an infection. That's why it's important to know what risk pools you're swimming in.
Posted by: Fuk Yo Mama
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 09:12 PM
Tranny's and gay male sex is much more high risk then male/female sex. That's just a fact. I know you don't like to admit it but it's just a fact. So I think performers have a right to know if their doing a scene with somebody who has amplified their risk by engaging in this type of sex.
Christian just because you've decided to roll the dice and make decisions that could kill you, doesn't mean all of your partners should have to do the same.
There is a difference.
Now go suck off Vanity and let the hetero people talk. (sorry that was just too easy)
Posted by: christianxxx
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/30/06 11:12 PM
start a list of the girls who have done bi/tranny videos...its much longer than you think
Posted by: The Ghost Is Toast
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/31/06 01:46 AM
Quote:
I watched it as part of review videos...
Suuuure you did. 
Posted by: bernardo
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/31/06 11:12 AM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If all performers are tested regularly, why is this more high-risk than any other combination?
Being tested regularly isn't sure proof. Let's say she caught something that day and 2 days later she went to another scene and shot and spread the disease even though she had a clean test that she took 2 weeks ago.
Can the test (2 weeks old) assure that she didn't catch anything after the day she shot with the tranny and bisexual guys?
you are a dumbass......thats the risk we take as performers. you are only as good as your last test. you dont ask people..."hey who have you been fucking since your test?" you trust the people you work with to be safe in their endeavors, both private and public. luscious lopez is no more a threat than penny flame or kelly wells or eva angelina or gia paloma or anyone other girl with a good test.
you get dumber and dumber with each post bro...seriously.
This is absolutely the most idiotic response I've seen. It's amazing how little learning has gone on with you since the last incident...
Posted by: Heyyou
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/31/06 01:16 PM
Quote:
I agree. It's more realistic to say that rather than trusting people, you take a calculated risk based on the slim probablity of them having picked up an infection. That's why it's important to know what risk pools you're swimming in.
fellow Ivor...100% correct...perfect. 
fellow christianxxx...keep on trusting man...keep on... 
...
...trust nobody but YOU !! That´s the key !!
Posted by: windsock
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/31/06 01:33 PM
Quote:
I saw a bird fly into a wall.
It's fun to laugh.
Posted by: christianxxx
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/31/06 02:12 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If all performers are tested regularly, why is this more high-risk than any other combination?
Being tested regularly isn't sure proof. Let's say she caught something that day and 2 days later she went to another scene and shot and spread the disease even though she had a clean test that she took 2 weeks ago.
Can the test (2 weeks old) assure that she didn't catch anything after the day she shot with the tranny and bisexual guys?
you are a dumbass......thats the risk we take as performers. you are only as good as your last test. you dont ask people..."hey who have you been fucking since your test?" you trust the people you work with to be safe in their endeavors, both private and public. luscious lopez is no more a threat than penny flame or kelly wells or eva angelina or gia paloma or anyone other girl with a good test.
you get dumber and dumber with each post bro...seriously.
This is absolutely the most idiotic response I've seen. It's amazing how little learning has gone on with you since the last incident...
learning? what did i learn? i am still the exact same person bro. and what incident are you talking about?
once again....as performers you take a calculated risk every time you do a scene in this business. that is just a fact. there are girls that wont work with me, and there are girls that i wont work with. its a two way street, just like it is for every other performer in this business.
Posted by: Crucifixio
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/31/06 02:25 PM
The bottom line is: if no one involved in said scene had any STDs or was infected with anything then it doesn't make a difference if they were gay, transsexual, black or white. It may not be my personal preference to do or to watch but for someone to jump to conclusions simply because someone has unprotected sex with a gay or transsexual individual is sort of silly in this day and age. Not every gay and transsexual person is a cesspool of venereal disease.
Or at least, that's what I hear.
Posted by: Azaël
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/31/06 02:31 PM
Quote:
you are a dumbass......thats the risk we take as performers. you are only as good as your last test. you dont ask people..."hey who have you been fucking since your test?" you trust the people you work with to be safe in their endeavors, both private and public.
Isn't he sweet? 
Posted by: safado
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 08/31/06 10:54 PM
You have a talent for stating the obvious but the point is, that a person who engages in unprotected Gay sex is more likely to have HIV.
Now I have no problem with anyone's sexuality and if Luscious Lopez wants to do bi scenes then more power to her.
But other Talent should be informed of this so they can make an informed decision whether or not they want to work with this person.
Posted by: mypornoreview
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/01/06 10:30 AM
Quote:
You have a talent for stating the obvious but the point is, that a person who engages in unprotected Gay sex is more likely to have HIV.
Now I have no problem with anyone's sexuality and if Luscious Lopez wants to do bi scenes then more power to her.
But other Talent should be informed of this so they can make an informed decision whether or not they want to work with this person.
It's one thing to do bi scenes but to do bareback bi scenes is completely dangerous. it is known that the gay and bi community DO NOT take monthly HIV tests.
Posted by: Macho Kiljoy
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/02/06 04:15 PM
CXXX is right. Many of your faves have sucked tranny cock.
Posted by: sexycity
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/03/06 04:55 PM
Quote:
I just saw a scene with Luscious Lopez with Kayla Cox a tranny with 3 other guys. They were doing bareback gay anal and vaginal with Luscious. All the guys fucked the tranny then fucked Luscious.
That's pretty fucking disgusting.
She must've really needed the $$$$ and had absolutely zero understanding of the risk involved. Bareback tranny sex is how the last outbreak started. What company put on that scene?
Posted by: mypornoreview
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/03/06 06:17 PM
no no no. it wasn't bareback tranny sex. it was bareback sex with guys that fucked the tranny in the ass. she didn't fuck the tranny bareback. each of the 3 guys took turns fucking the tranny then turned around and fuck lucsious lopez.
Posted by: *L*G*
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/03/06 07:34 PM
Quote:
I just saw a scene with Luscious Lopez with Kayla Cox a tranny with 3 other guys. They were doing bareback gay anal and vaginal with Luscious. All the guys fucked the tranny then fucked Luscious.
That's pretty fucking disgusting.
What is the name of the tittle?
Posted by: k1ng
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/03/06 09:17 PM
Quote:
Quote:
I just saw a scene with Luscious Lopez with Kayla Cox a tranny with 3 other guys. They were doing bareback gay anal and vaginal with Luscious. All the guys fucked the tranny then fucked Luscious.
That's pretty fucking disgusting.
What is the name of the tittle?
I'm surprised you don't already own it.
Posted by: Paul Reubens
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/04/06 03:28 AM
What a huge shocker, I'm just going to sit here stunned beyond belief.
Posted by: *L*G*
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/04/06 04:51 AM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I just saw a scene with Luscious Lopez with Kayla Cox a tranny with 3 other guys. They were doing bareback gay anal and vaginal with Luscious. All the guys fucked the tranny then fucked Luscious.
That's pretty fucking disgusting.
What is the name of the tittle?
I'm surprised you don't already own it.
not unfortunately, for that reason I want to know the name of the title 
Posted by: johnno rogers
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/07/06 03:52 AM
My porno review,
Stop being such a retard. Male-male bareback sex is no more risky than male-female bareback sex. In both cases, a penis goes into the colon. Big fucking deal.
If both partners taking part in the anal sex act are healthy, whether male-male or male-female, there is no risk to any of them. The risk is zero - repeat, zero.
The key to it is the health of the individuals. Two healthy individuals will never pass on anything to each other. If a healthy bisexual man has sex with a healthy woman, there is no risk at all.
Get your fucking facts right before commenting on this issue again, retard.
Posted by: mypornoreview
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/07/06 10:46 AM
Obviously you haven't read the other discussions and the stats from CDC. Yes male-male bareback is no more riskier than female to male but the tranmission rate is far higher. There are over 17691 new cases of male to male bareback HIV transmission compared to 298 for female to male bareback HIV transmission.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/2004report/table3.htm
As far as healthy individuals, how does one know if they didn't catch anything from the time of their test to the time of the shoot?
The CDC and health care professions consider homosexual anal sex far more riskier than hetrosexual anal sex.
Okay 3 post guy. You obviously don't know what the fuck you are talking about.
Quote:
My porno review,
Stop being such a retard. Male-male bareback sex is no more risky than male-female bareback sex. In both cases, a penis goes into the colon. Big fucking deal.
If both partners taking part in the anal sex act are healthy, whether male-male or male-female, there is no risk to any of them. The risk is zero - repeat, zero.
The key to it is the health of the individuals. Two healthy individuals will never pass on anything to each other. If a healthy bisexual man has sex with a healthy woman, there is no risk at all.
Get your fucking facts right before commenting on this issue again, retard.
web page
Posted by: bernardo
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/08/06 07:42 AM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If all performers are tested regularly, why is this more high-risk than any other combination?
Being tested regularly isn't sure proof. Let's say she caught something that day and 2 days later she went to another scene and shot and spread the disease even though she had a clean test that she took 2 weeks ago.
Can the test (2 weeks old) assure that she didn't catch anything after the day she shot with the tranny and bisexual guys?
you are a dumbass......thats the risk we take as performers. you are only as good as your last test. you dont ask people..."hey who have you been fucking since your test?" you trust the people you work with to be safe in their endeavors, both private and public. luscious lopez is no more a threat than penny flame or kelly wells or eva angelina or gia paloma or anyone other girl with a good test.
you get dumber and dumber with each post bro...seriously.
This is absolutely the most idiotic response I've seen. It's amazing how little learning has gone on with you since the last incident...
learning? what did i learn? i am still the exact same person bro. and what incident are you talking about?
once again....as performers you take a calculated risk every time you do a scene in this business. that is just a fact. there are girls that wont work with me, and there are girls that i wont work with. its a two way street, just like it is for every other performer in this business.
The incident I was referring to was the last outbreak, which did start with unprotected Tranny sex.
So if you didn't learn anything then....well, it's a free country.
Now as far as risk, if you can't see that the way to mitigate risk is through validated information then...well, again it's a free country.
Maybe you just have a higher appetite for risk.
Keep on keepin on Homes!
Posted by: *L*G*
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/08/06 07:57 AM
name of the tittle
Posted by: mypornoreview
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/08/06 03:34 PM
I just got a copy of the scene not the full dvd. I will upload the scene on my server so you can download and watch it.
Posted by: The Ghost Is Toast
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 09/09/06 01:52 AM
Quote:
I just got a copy of the scene not the full dvd. I will upload the scene on my server so you can download and watch it.
Wouldn't that infringe upon the rights of the producer of said scene, thus being illegal? 
Posted by: jamesn
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 11/27/06 02:44 PM
anyone shoot a flamethrower into her vagina to make sure it's kosher yet?
Posted by: Wendy Williams
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 01:25 AM
Quote:
Quote:
I just saw a scene with Luscious Lopez with Kayla Cox a tranny with 3 other guys. They were doing bareback gay anal and vaginal with Luscious. All the guys fucked the tranny then fucked Luscious.
That's pretty fucking disgusting.
She must've really needed the $$$$ and had absolutely zero understanding of the risk involved. Bareback tranny sex is how the last outbreak started. What company put on that scene?
You are kidding me correct? It is ignorant foolish nonsense statements that make postal. As a Transsexaul Talent and Producer I am tested EVERY 30 days and EVERY female, male, and ts who work in my videos are required by the same standards as anyone else. Please tell me about this "tranny outbreak" that happened?
American Transsexual Pornstars: Gia Darling, Vaniity, Vicki Richter, myself,Danielle Foxxx etccc ALL are AIM tested on a regular basis. I have worked for Joey Silveria, Devils, Anabolic and every time the required the same requirments.
You people really should educate yourself before spitting out pure LIES and things that arent factual. There has NEVER been a HIV tranny outbreak here in the U.S.........
You would be really really shocked if you knew how many "STARS" both female and male who keep company with special ladies as myself.
Wendy Williams
Posted by: k1ng
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 01:34 AM
Quote:
You would be really really shocked if you knew how many "STARS" both female and male who keep company with special ladies as myself.
Wendy Williams
I don't believe you and I'm sure this is pure fabrication unless you can provide specifics such as names and dates. Straight porn STARS, my heroes, mingling with transsexuals is unconscionable.
Posted by: Wendy Williams
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 01:40 AM
Believe what you like Im not here to spill anyones business and a liar I am not but it doesnt matter really.
I love how taboo you think we as transsexuals are when in fact its really common now. I was just having this conversation with Jazzymen Byrne and Justine Joli a couple months ago. WHICH you can see me make a non sex role in this all girl dvd as Justines evil stepmother
(I also got a prenom by AVN for next year)..Anyhow back to the topic I dont think a guy needs to discuss who he sleeps with whether its a ts, guy, girl and I for one dont really care and neither should you.
Wendy
Posted by: k1ng
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 01:58 AM
Wendy, first of all, it is of the utmost importance that you check in with us and post here at least once a week. Your perspective on some of the topics we address would be highly valued. Second of all, OK, granted, certain lower tier, sub-par porners like Kurt Trannywood "catching" transsexuals doesn't really bother me. And to be honest I'm open to the idea of other "guys" being sodomized by shemales, many of them deserve it. We should really start a list of who needs to be dominated by the third sex: ---- Ryan K., I know you lurk, are you open to the possibility? Smartt, I'm sure he's an old pro. Gurt, he's got all the digits on speed dial no doubt, others feel free to add--
Posted by: Wendy Williams
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 02:03 AM
Posted by: k1ng
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 02:10 AM
Quote:
Wendy,
I'm crushed. My request for you to come visit and post more regularly was made with 100% sincerity and I find your flippant attitude towards my generosity very disappointing.
Posted by: gia jordan
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 02:36 AM
Quote:
WHICH you can see me make a non sex role in this all girl dvd as Justines evil stepmother (I also got a prenom by AVN for next year)
Like when Divine played the mom in Hairspray!!! Off topic, but that's pretty fucking cool.
Posted by: Jeff Steward
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 09:58 AM
Quote:
Believe what you like Im not here to spill anyones business and a liar I am not but it doesnt matter really.
Please refer to porn rule # 1 be it male,female or all of the above.
Posted by: ChickenMaster
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 09:59 AM
Wendy = Uptight transsexual, trying to shove his small world views down everyone's throat.
If you were so common, why would you feel the need to highlight that fact? I'm sorry God fucked with your mother's hormones while you were in the womb, but unfortunately for you, the majority find you repulsive. Unless you think past your sexuality, your desire to desperately be a woman and contribute to society in some positive way, you are useless. From what I have seen, for the most part, people like you don't think of anything past their selfish preoccupation with themselves.
Posted by: windsock
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 10:11 AM
Quote:
I'm sorry God fucked with your mother's hormones while you were in the womb, but unfortunately for you, the majority find you repulsive. Unless you think past your sexuality, your desire to desperately be a woman and contribute to society in some positive way, you are useless. From what I have seen, for the most part, people like you don't think of anything past their selfish preoccupation with themselves.
Now wait a minute, ChickenMaster. You just said that unfortunates like this person are regarded as "repulsive" by a majority of the Society. You then go on to characterize their self preoccupation in the face of such derision as "selfish" and narcissistic. Is it not we, the repulsed masses, who created them in this image, forcing them to run to delusional and insulated concepts of self as a desperate coping mechanism? This is counter-productive thoughtlessness in your committment to being a monumental prick and renders you in mine eyes no better than nabobs live have2cit or phlogpioston.
Posted by: ChickenMaster
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 10:14 AM
Quote:
Quote:
I'm sorry God fucked with your mother's hormones while you were in the womb, but unfortunately for you, the majority find you repulsive. Unless you think past your sexuality, your desire to desperately be a woman and contribute to society in some positive way, you are useless. From what I have seen, for the most part, people like you don't think of anything past their selfish preoccupation with themselves.
Now wait a minute, ChickenMaster. You just said that unfortunates like this person are regarded as "repulsive" by a majority of the Society. You then go on to characterize their self preoccupation in the face of such derision as "selfish" and narcissistic. Is it not we, the repulsed masses, who created them in this image, forcing them to run to delusional and insulated concepts of self as a desperate coping mechanism? This is counter-productive thoughtlessness in your committment to being a monumental prick and renders you in mine eyes no better than nabobs live have2cit or phlogpioston.
Considering how much I want to beat the shit out of you with a sack of oranges, how much of a surprise is that really?
Posted by: windsock
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 10:19 AM
Quote:
Considering how much I want to beat the shit out of you with a sack of oranges, how much of a surprise is that really?
I don't understand what is going on here. We need to have a talk, you and me.
Posted by: have2cit
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 10:25 AM
Quote:
Now wait a minute, ChickenMaster. You just said that unfortunates like this person are regarded as "repulsive" by a majority of the Society. You then go on to characterize their self preoccupation in the face of such derision as "selfish" and narcissistic. Is it not we, the repulsed masses, who created them in this image, forcing them to run to delusional and insulated concepts of self as a desperate coping mechanism? This is counter-productive thoughtlessness in your committment to being a monumental prick and renders you in mine eyes no better than nabobs live have2cit or phlogpioston.
Quit being such a Hyde.
ChickenMaster -
I recommend replacing the oranges, in your sack, with billiard balls. The effect is so much better.
Posted by: Bornyo
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 10:28 AM
the oranges smell better.
Posted by: Soopergrizz
Re: Luscious Lopez in a F/T/M/M/M bareback scene - 12/05/06 11:17 AM
Quote:
the oranges smell better.
And when you're done, wring out the sack for a deliciously wholesome beverage!
