Quote:

Quote:

I lost my mother to cancer at 48. I know I'm not going to be popular for saying this, but I think it has to be said.

Everyone has limited personal resources. We can only spare a certain amount of money to donate to good causes. If we give it to one cause, then another misses out. So why should we give money to a specific individual, rather than donate to one of the many worthy cancer research charities, which spend their resources with the common good of all cancer sufferers in mind?

I mean, somewhere in the Czech Republic there is probably a small child dying of the same brain cancer Lea has. Why should we give our money to Lea instead? Just because we like to see her take it up the ass on camera?




Just because there is not equal opportunity between Lea and the small eastern European child, doesn't mean people can't spare Lea a little coffee money to see her take it up the ass again.



The $150,000 Lea needs is more than "a little coffee money".

Of course, everyone is entitled to give their money to whatever cause they wish, and I'm not saying it's a bad thing to help Lea with this... But anyone who feels good about themselves, and thinks they're doing their bit by giving their money this way should realise that their generosity has been colored by their self-interest in seeing Lea take it up the ass again. If they really care about cancer sufferers, they should give their money to a proper charity that will help anyone suffering this horrible disease.
_________________________
"If I were a guy, not swallowing would be a deal breaker. So what if you cook and clean? I can get a maid for that." - Gia Jordan