The case that said it is not pandering to hire actors to produce porn is the Hal Freeman case. It was decided on the basis of Kalifornia state law (it was appealed to the US supreme court but turned away for lack of a federal issue).

What this means is that you're not protected by this is Ohio. You might prevail for other reasons, but not that one. I have no idea how much real risk there is in Ohio.

Lawrence Walters, a First Amendment lawyer, published an article on this titled CREATING ADULT CONTENT OUTSIDE OF CALIFORNIA