Only In This World...

I'd like to raise a few questions, and bring some things to the attention of the public. Some of you may not agree; some of you may not understand; still others may simply not listen, but for those of you who enjoy a good spring cleaning of the ol' melon, here's a good brain pickin' for ya.
First question:

CUM VS. PISS
Why do we have what is gross backwards? Why do girls who swallow cum every day without blinking an eyelash recoil in horror when they discover that I let boys piss on my face, on my body and -- gasp --- swallow it too?! Why does NO ONE think this through before they spit (no pun intended) their horror and distaste for my actions into my face, with conviction and confidence that they are on the moral/healthy high-ground?
Sperm is designed to maintain living organisms (keep stuff alive in it), while piss is chiefly water and salt. (That's why it tastes like water.) Sperm is thick, stringy stuff that coagulates immediately as it touches the air; piss is the same consistency as water (it IS water), and doesn't taste nearly as strongly. Why is it that girls who revile the idea of a man pissing on them, simultaneously relish the concept of his snotty organisms writhing all over her face?
Why? Because we have been conditioned since birth to believe that "potty" things are naughty and bad. Even as adults, we maintain this same fear and distaste for urination, although it is completely illogical and based only in the folklore of childhood training. Even when I sit down with a girl and explain everything to her, the facts, the harmlessness of urine and the benign taste, she still recoils in horror. Instead of processing the information she's just been given, she slips backward into the default programming of social taboos. "I'll swallow his cum," she eagerly offers, and I just slap my forehead with my palm.

POLYGAMY VS. CHEATING
Why is it that if a man has more than one wife, and they all live together in harmony, fuck occasionally perhaps, and it is a situation where both women are aware of one another instead of being lied to and cheated on, it is "sick"? But when a man cheats on a woman, it is considered "typical", and a simple result of a mid-life crisis? I find it interesting that, in our society today where we publicly promote love and honesty that we can actually bring ourselves to complain when three people can love each other so hard, and create a bond so great that they can share one another in a polygamous relationship. These are people who are confident in their position as a wife or husband. These are people who love one another so much that the idea of bringing another person into their relationship is actually interesting and exciting instead of threatening and horrifying. These are people who have come to a point in their relationship where they completely and utterly trust the ones they love with all of their hearts and minds. How can that be bad? How can it be wrong? How can it be worse than a monogamous couple who are paranoid about one other's whereabouts and alternately suspect the other of cheating?
Two women are in love with one man. These women are also in love with one another. Love is spread generously throughout.
Then there are people who will actually ask: What if you decide to have kids? What are you going to tell them?
Tell them? We tell them that Mommy loves Mommy and Daddy loves both Mommies, and both Mommies love Daddy. And all of these people think that he [the child] is a great human being, and love him [the child] with all of their hearts. Why is it that people truly believe that raising a child in a broken home is much better for the child than raising a child in a home where affection is widespread, with three people who are all in love, and who give the child love and attention? The likelyhood that the child will ever be left alone, or with someone not part of the family, is slim to none. There are enough people (people whom the child loves and is familiar with) to care for the child, and more. If having two parents is good, and having one parent isn't as good, then having three parents is way better than having two. It's only logical, don't you think? But we simply can't bring ourselves to admit it, being that it isn't the social norm. It isn't the nuclear family model for society today. And let's face it, if you're not a nuclear family or a broken home, you just don't fit in here in America.

ANAL VS. VAGINAL
Why is it that women insist that a very big cock could only go in their pussies, but certainly not up their ass? Your ass is a muscle which expands to whatever size is demanded of it (within the limits of your body size and bone structure, of course) and can take much more than the vagina. Women constantly tell me, "Hell no, I hate anal sex! I tried it once, and it hurt!" (I'm sure vaginal sex wasn't a picnic the first time either, but you don't see them quitting that!) "Well, my man has a huge cock, and I can barely get it into my pussy, so I definitely couldn't take it up my ass!" (If women had children from their asses, they probably would need no more drugging for labor than a glass of wine.) The sphincter, when tightened, is nearly impenetrable, though it can be forced open, which can cause pain. LOTS of pain. But when relaxed, the sphincter can open wider than a cunt (well, with much more ease, that is). When a cunt stretches, it can be painful (i.e., childbirth, etc.), but as soon as the sphincter is stretched only a half-inch, it is ready to expand to any width required, with ease.
When you attempt something for the first time, it's never going to go right. Especially if, when you attempted this experience, you were with some other 18-year-old loser who could barely tell his cock from a pogo stick if it wasn't attatched to his body, who probably crammed it up there without teasing, playing with, or fingering it at all; just a couple dips from the index finger with some vaseline and he was off to the races. Just a guess, but maybe it could be better with, oh, I don't know, someone you love and trust?? How many couples have I come across, the guy half-complaining that she won't do anal sex, and the girl ranting, "Hell, no, I tried it once with my ex-boyfriend Frank and I'll never go there again!". The guy rolls his eyes and I try very hard not to do it myself.
My advice: try it, try it again, try it again, and try it again. Get drunk and try it. If you don't relax, it won't feel good. If you can relax right away, it should be a PHENOMENAL experience. (Oh yeah, guys... tell your girlfriend to breathe out when you try to stick something in there; it's easier.) And girls? This is one of the ultimate sexual experiences you will ever have in your entire lives. It rubs your g-spot wonderfully and you should end up having an earth-shattering orgasm sooner or later. I know your man will.
Try it over and over. You'll get the hang of it, and then beware: YOU'LL BE ADDICTED FOR LIFE!! Besides, could millions of gay men be wrong??

SEATBELTS VS. CONDOMS
Why is it that I know almost no one who wears a seatbelt consistantly, but I know so many people who think that porn or swinging is too risky?? A seatbelt is much more likely to save your life than a condom: to a virus, the pores in a condom are huge tunnels through which many at once can easily pass; a condom helps prevent pregnancy, but isn't birth control the obvious option for any intelligent, sexually active female? So the condom is for... added texture?? Yeah, sure. In Trojans We Trust... it's AIDS we're worried about? Wear your seatbelt before you start freaking out about something far less likely... it's kind of like quitting your job so you can be ready when you win the lottery.
Condoms are good ideas. No doubt about it; sure, if you're not that into the guy you're fucking or if you're fucking someone you don't trust, it's understandable. Go ahead, make yourself feel better. Do the saran-wrap-over-the-pussy thing when you eat a girl out. Just remember, sex is supposed to be fun; it's not a scientific experiment.
And condoms can be useful. I use them on occasion myself. Say for instance I'm going to work but he wants to cum inside me. I simply use a condom; he cums inside me, in the condom, and I don't have sperm leaking down my legs when I walk into my strip club. Or, say for instance you need some lube and you don't have any handy, but you do have a lubricated condom. Voila! Insta-lube! No mess! Or, you are a few days overdue on the birth control shot and you have to be cautious not to get pregnant while you're waiting to get your next one. Condoms are useful for alot of things, but don't let them replace your standards.
If I am fucking a stranger, I have made a decision that I will allow this person to use my body for his enjoyment, and I will use his for mine. I am tested regularly for STD's (and of course prefer that my partners be), though this person may not be. While I'm sucking his cock, I try to check if he's got any warts, and while I'm swallowing his cum I try to notice if it has an irregular taste. COME ON PEOPLE. Just stop being paranoid, ditch the saran wrap and enjoy one another like God intended. When looking for a sexual partner, choose them based on reputation, cleanliness, maintenance, and... oh yeah, did we forget, you might want to like his COCK? What type of person is he? Did you ask him how long he's been in the swinging lifestyle and, if he's been in it for long, does he get tested regularly? He probably does, if he's worth a shit. Use your judgement, not condoms.

VIOLENCE VS. NUDITY
Why is it that in the same news broadcast, you can see blatant depictions of millions of slaughtered, dying and injured people, blood and guts, bombs, shootings, etc., and all they need do is introduce the program after the commercial break with a "This program includes material that may not be suitable for children."... and then the next story comes on, about a pornographic internet website, and they blur the pictures so badly, no one can even tell if they are people?? (But at least we saw the tractor-trailer plowing down the four-year-old clearly enough).
I find the paradox infuriating and mind-boggling. Doesn't it seem logical that sex, something that everyone does at least once in their life (barring a tragically young death or a horrific disfigurement of some kind) is the worst thing a child can see, according to probably 97% of the parents out there... and yet murder, something that (hopefully) your child will never participate in, is portrayed on television without a worry or care in the world from most parents. Is there something wrong with those statistics?
Here's my take: when they're young, they have this annoying habit of copying everything they see on TV. Therefore, I would most likely censor the wrestling/violence they watch on TV to keep me sane. I would censor heavy sexual content to keep them out of trouble with their peers and elders, but not because it's "wrong" for them to see naked people, or to see people having sex. Once they're old enough to talk to about sex and violence (old enough to understand the difference between pretend and real), there's no reason to protect them from simply viewing things on television.
And what does a child conclude from a porno film that would be so bad? Show affection? Love one another? Be intimate? Oh, no. Not that! We'd rather let them watch romanticized films about evil villains destroying the entire universe, or bad guys blowing up hostages and shooting people in the back of the head. Yeah, I'd rather see them grow up to be an evil villain than have sex.

INFANT NUDITY VS. YOUNG ADULT NUDITY
Why is it that if you take a naked picture of a four-month old, it's "cute", but if you take a naked picture of a 14 year old it's "sick"? Where do we draw the line? And why?? Does it make sense to be able to take nude pictures of an unconsenting child and be unable to take pictures of a consenting young adult? The fourteen year old is obviously more aware of said picture, and it is possible for them to participate in the photo session of their own free will... how is it worse to take pictures of a person who may be able to say no or fight back? Besides, only if we ASSUME that there is attraction for a fourteen year old child is there a problem... how about an attraction for a four month old child... isn't that worse??
It's understandable and commendable that the laws today would work to protect those who may be taken advantage of by uncaring parents, uncles or strangers who might use their influence on the child to force them into sexual activities they aren't yet emotionally prepared for. But a picture of some kid in a tub? Why is that suddenly a crime, when a naked picture of an even younger child is not?

In America today, many people are conned into not using their brain at all and swallowing every little conviction that slips through the media today, or that someone teaches them on Oprah. It's tempting to let society make up your mind for you, and follow the butt in front of you. But look around; there's plenty of wonderful scenery here in this world you may be missing because you're too worried about keeping your nose up the butt in front of you. Don't be part of the crowd; if you question yourself, debate your own convictions and come to the same conclusion, then follow your heart. But give yourself the chance to change your mind.

There are many questions that should be addressed and pondered about our society today. Don't follow, lead. And please think... just THINK.

Sexually yours,

BisexualBritni

Britni, you raise some valid points, though you twist stuff to suit your own thesis <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> But hey, a writer is supposed to convince people and bring the borderline people onto her side <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

Btw, I had heard that you planned to appear with your mom(think it was in an interview of yours that I read somewhere) in a sex scene and that it won't be strange cause you guys have shared men in the past.True?

Yes, I was going to do a live sex show for KSEX with my mom, but the lawyers decided it was not the best idea. Yes, I have been with my mom a great many times. Both, mono e mono and in triads.

But don´t we all?
BB´s writing amuses me. A lot, in fact. Keep on postin´!

Smartt, we all gotta twist stuff to make it look like we are right <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> and that is exactly what I told Britni. Being in college and having to take 5 English courses with my engineering courses, I should know <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> I have finished 3 English courses as of now, and I can't remember any teacher who hasn't drilled it into our heads that we need to write so that our thesis makes us look like Einstein !!

It's a pity Britney has moved into the background. It would be great if she still posted here.

Hey, I always wear a seatbelt, but I'd let Britney do a piss in my mouth anytime.

I guess she returned to ADT. Grrr.

way too much shit to read <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/snooz.gif" alt="" />

Ah. And this is due to lazyness or illiteracy?