Moxie's spot on. The first question, as I've said repeatedly, is a First Amendment issue that will ultimately play out in the courts, although the venue (Middle District of Florida, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals) really stack the cards against Him. It could very well make it's way to the Supreme Court in two or three years. If the make up of the court stays the same, then it will probably be up to Justice Kennedy. I haven't had time in the last few weeks to read up on his past votes in obsceneties cases, so it's a toss up.

As for the second question, Counsellor, you should really know better. Certainly, you should know the Canon of Ethics well enough to know you don't go asking about matters involving the Attorney-Client relationship, especialy regarding fees and expenses, and Especially in a public forum. Here in New York, you'd be before the Disciplinary Committee, were you not protected by anonymity.

I don't know if Moxie's correct that "its just an attempt to point out again he's a lawyer," but the fact remains that you do point it out an awful lot. Until this moment, I've never stated outright that I'm an attorney, although some have guessed at it, yourself included. Never even put it on my MySpace, though I may as well now. There's a reason for that: This is a Porn forum, not a legal forum. I've only ventured a legal opinion here as it relates to Max, or the Age of Consent in the Backwards parts of the Country, or some other thing bearing on perversion. Where Moxie is absolutely correct, as Conky concurrs, is at the end:

Quote:

The phrase trying too hard seems appropriate. Just try being a pervert for a change.



So you're a lawyer. So am I. So is Moxie. So is Michael. And, if I'm not mistaken, so is Low Rider. Out of all of us, only Michael makes his living handling cases involving the Porn Industry. The rest of us are just perverts with a JD. I try to leave the law at the office (though I often post from the office.) I suggest you do the same for a bit.